[Accueil][Objectifs][Nouveautés][Pétitions][Témoignages][Faire un don][Articles médias][Jura et les sectes][La manipulation]

 

Ron Hubbard is more McCarthyite than McCarthy

The items listed below all come from public sources in the US. Most were obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); some come from the still-sealed exhibits of the 1984 case Church of Scientology of California vs Gerald Armstrong (but were obtained legally, both here in Europe and in the US). They present a rather different picture of Hubbard, showing him to have a much darker side than is officially admitted by Scientology.

 

Source: http://www.spaink.net/cos/LRH-bio/lrhpaper.htm

 

L. Ron Hubbard and the "Nazi Spy", May 1940

In 1940, L. Ron Hubbard was living a hand-to-mouth existence in New York City, writing penny-a-word pulp fiction stories. Whilst there, he apparently had an argument with a steward in the hotel at which he was staying.

He promptly got revenge by denouncing to the FBI the unfortunate man, who was of German descent, as being "a menace to the state". This was, it seems, the first contact he had had with the FBI and began what became a long tradition for him of denouncing to the authorities those he disliked.

It also emphasised his Germanophobia, a trait which he never lost (and which is still visible today in the Church of Scientology's campaign against the Federal Republic). Needless to say, the allegation was patently baseless and the FBI took no action.

Transcript:

                          243 Riverside Drive
                          New York City
                          May 16, 1940
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Department of Justice
Washington, D.C.

Gentlemen;

May I bring to your attention an individual whose Nazi activities, in time of national emergency if not at present, might constitute him a menace to the state?

The name is [CENSORED] a German whose sister is a member of the Gestapo in Germany. His anti-American discourses concern in the main what he would do in case we went to war with Germany, and he never speaks for publication along this line but only privately. As steward of the [CENSORED] he supports an almost entirely German staff, discouraging the employment of Americans. He entered this country illegally, according to his private statement. In my opinion he is definitely "fifth column". He can be found at the [CENSORED] [CENSORED] in NYC.

My interest in this is impersonal, though possibly shaded by the feeling of dislike which he always inspires in me for he is the last man in the world I would trust. And I fear that all too soon we will have need of every precaution to safeguard our country.

Sincerely,

[signed]

L. Ron Hubbard

 

 

Transcript:

JSW:MAL
65-3115-1 [?]

    May 24, 1940

Mr. L. Ron Hubbard
243 Riverside Drive
New York, New York

Dear Mr. Hubbard,

              I wish to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated May 16, 1940, for which I am most appreciative.

              I am referring this matter to Mr. P.E. Foxworth, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice, 607 W. S. Court House, Foley Square, New York, New York, who will have an Agent of that Office call upon you in the near future to determine whether the information in your possession indicates the violation of a Federal Statute coming within the investigative jurisdiction of this Bureau.

Very truly yours,

John Edgar Hoover,
Director

CC - New York (with copy of incoming)

Transcript:

Source: http://www.spaink.net/cos/LRH-bio/nazispy3.htm

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

THIS CASE ORIGINATED AT NEW YORK, NEW YORK NY FILE NO. 65-2437 ERL
REPORT MADE AT
NEW YORK CITY
DATE WHEN MADE
8/7/40
PERIOD FOR WHICH MADE
7/5,17/40
REPORT MADE BY
[CENSORED]
TITLE
L. RON HUBBARD - INFORMANT
CHARACTER OF CASE
ESPIONAGE
SYNOPSIS OF FACTS: Subject reported steward at [CENSORED][CENSORED] and to have sympathies with the Nazi cause. His sister is alleged to be a member of the Gestapo in Germany. Efforts to locate the informant unsuccess-
ful. Subject has no credit rating NYC.
 
- C -
DETAILS:
AT NEW YORK CITY

This investigation is based upon a letter received at the Bureau from L. RON HUBBARD dated May 16, 1940 which sets out that [CENSORED] is a German whose sister is a member of the Gestapo in Germany and that in times of national emergency he might constitute a menace to this country.

Subject is reported to be anti-American in his dis- courses which are not for publication but among friends in private. He is a steward at the [CENSORED] [CENSORED] New York City, and said hotel is reported to support an almost entirely Germany staff. Subject was reported to have entered the country illegally and in the opinion of the informant, he is definitely "fifth column."

APPROVED AND FORWARDED
[signed: B.E. Lachitt]
DO NOT WRITE IN THESE BOXES
 
654 118
1340
COPIES OF THIS REPORT

5 - Bureau
1 - Washington Field (Info)
2 - New York

 
Deleted Copy Sent ____________

   
 

65-2437




An effort was made to locate the informant at

243 Riverside Drive, the address which appears at the top of
the communication he forwarded to the Bureau. It was learned
at the said address that informant moved out on or about
June 1, 1940, stating he was moving to Washington, D.C. He
left no forwarding address and it was further learned that
the mail carrier had no forwarding address. When inquiry was
made at the apartment house located at 243 Riverside Drive if
there had been any other address whereby informant might be
reached, it was learned that the informant was a writer but
there was no indication as to his employer or his address.

[PARAGRAPH CENSORED]

No effort was made to conduct investigation in the
vicinity of the [CENSORED] as subject would be
immediately apprized of such investigation.

In view of the indefinite nature of the complaint
and the inability to locate the informant in this case, this
case is being closed.

- C L O S E D -

- 2 -

 

Ron kidnaps his daughter under an alias, Feb 1951

By the start of 1951, L. Ron Hubbard's marriage was in terminal decline. He was suffering badly from paranoia and depression, and his Dianetics Foundation was in serious financial trouble. He blamed his wife Sara for this and became morbidly convinced that she was trying to kill him. He wrote:

    "I was in my apartment on February 23rd, about two or three o'clock in the morning when the apartment was entered, I was knocked out, had a needle thrust into my heart to give it a jet of air to produce a "coronary thrombosis" and was given an electric shock with a 110 volt current. This is all very blurred to me. I had no witnesses. But only one person had another key to that apartment and that was Sara."

Curiously, Ron did not report this to the police and produced no medical evidence of any injuries. But the following day, he decided to retaliate. He kidnapped his baby daughter Alexis Valerie - whom he was later to disown as "illegitimate" - to use as a bargaining chip against his wife. He took his daughter to a nursing agency in Los Angeles and then went back to kidnap Sara, in an attempt to have her declared insane by a tame psychiatrist. (See Sara's affidavit for her account of this incident.) The following document is the completely false declaration which Ron made to the nursing agency, using the pseudonym "James Olsen".

     

 
Sara's affidavit
 
WARNER & JACKSON
639 South Spring Street
Los Angeles 14, California
Tucker 9171
Attorneys for Plaintiff

[Stamped: FILED Apr 23 1951, Harold Cecily, County Clerk]

          IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SARA NORTHRUP HUBBARD,                    )
                                          )
Plaintiff,                                )
                                          )
vs.                                       )
                                          )
L. RON HUBBARD, also known as             )
LAFAYETTE RONALD HUBBARD; Los             )
Angeles Department HUBBARD DIANETIC       )    No. D
RESEARCH FOUNDATION, a partnership;       )    COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE
THE HUBBARD DIANETIC RESEARCH             )
FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a         )
California corporation; FRANK B.          )
DESSLER; RICHARD B. DE MILLE;             )
VINCE MC GONIGEL; WESTWOOD NURSES         )
REGISTRY AGENCY; BEKINS VAN AND           )
STORAGE CO.; BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL     )
TRUST & SAVINGS ASSOCIATION; SECURITY     )
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES;       )
DOE ONE, DOE TWO, DOE THREE, DOE FOUR,    )
DOE FIVE, DOE SIX, DOE SEVEN, DOE         )
EIGHT, DOE NINE and DOE TEN,              )
                                          )
             Defendants.                  )
------------------------------------------)

[Stamped: D414408]

	COMES NOW the plaintiff and for cause of action against
defendants alleges and says:

                                 I

	That in the early part of 1946, plaintiff, then age 21
and unmarried, resided with her family in Pasadena, and a
the University of Southern California, that at said time,
defendant L. Ron Hubbard, hereinafter referred to as "Hubbard",
was a married man, age 35, he being then married to Margaret Grubb

                               - 1 -


Hubbard of Bremerton, Washington, they having two children; that
said Hubbard represented to plaintiff that he was single and un-
married, and plaintiff relying upon said representation, and hav-
ing fallen in love, entered into a marriage ceremony with said
Hubbard on the 10th day of August, 1946, at Chestertown, Maryland
that said Hubbard thereafter secured a divorce from said Margaret
Grubb Hubbard on or about the 24th day of December, 1947, at
Port Orchard, Washington; that plaintiff and said Hubbard ever
since the said 10th day of August, 1946, have lived together as
husband and wife, and on the 8th day of March, 1950, had a child
born to them, Alexis Valorie [sic] Hubbard, at Point Pleasant, New
Jersey; that the parties have always considered themselves
husband and wife in their travels about the nation; that at all
times herein mentioned, said Hubbard has represented to plaintiff
that they were legally married, and plaintiff relied upon such
representations; that by reason thereof, plaintiff alleges herein.
that plaintiff and said Hubbard are husband and wife; that in
the event it should be held that the parties are not legally
married, plaintiff will seek the damages prayed for herein for
fraud and deceit on the part of said Hubbard, in entrapping
plaintiff into the matrimonial predicament that she now finds
herself in.

                               II

	That plaintiff was born in Pasadena, California on the
8th day of April, 1925, and grew up and was educated in the State
of California; that plaintiff does now and always has considered
California to be her home state, and plaintiff and said Hubbard
have maintained their residence in California from time to time
since said marriage in between their travels about the United
States and at all times have had their furniture in the State of
California, and have considered California to be their permanent
residence; that by reason thereof, plaintiff is now and for more

                             - 2 -


than one year immediately preceding the commencement of this
action, has been a resident of the State of California; that
plaintiff has been a resident of the County of Los Angeles for
more than three months, immediately preceding the commencement
of this action.

                              III

	Statistical facts required by section 426a of the Civil
Code of Procedure are:

(1) Place of marriage; Chestertown, Maryland;

(2) Date of marriage; On the 10th day of August
1946;

(3) Date of separation; On or about the 24th day of
February 1951;

(4) Time elapsing between the date of marriage and
the date of separation; Approximately four years, six months
and twelve days; and

(5) There is one child of the marriage; Alexis
Valorie Hubbard, age 13 months.

                               IV

	That there is community property of the plaintiff and
said Hubbard consisting of a community interest in the Hubbard
Dianetic Research Foundation, with its headquarters in Elizabeth.
New Jersey, and which operates a school and clinic in Chicago,
Illinois, New York City, Los Angeles, Honolulu, Wichita, Kansas,
and elsewhere; that said Hubbard and said foundation did over
one million dollars in business during the year 1950, and owns
valuable community property and assets; that said foundation
operates in the State of California, under the name of "The
Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation of California, Inc., a
California corporation", defendant herein; that said corporation.
is the alter ego of said Hubbard.

                             - 3 -


	That said separation took place by reason of the extreme
cruelty practiced upon the plaintiff by the said Hubbard, which
has caused the plaintiff great mental anguish and physical suffer-
ing during the past five years of the married life of the parties,
consisting in part as follows;

	(a) That during the marriage up until the month of
October, 1950, said Hubbard, an "older man" completely dominated
the youthful plaintiff, both physically, mentally and emotionally
and taking advantage of her trusting love and desire for a success-
ful marriage, repeatedly subjected plaintiff to systematic torture,
including loss of sleep, beatings, and strangulations and scientific
torture experiments, including the following: 

	(b) That in the latter part of September, 1950, said
Hubbard told plaintiff at the Chateau Marmont Apartments in
Hollywood, that "I do not want to be an American husband for I
can buy my friends whenever I want them", and he further said
that he, Hubbard, did not want to be married, yet divorce was
impossible, for a divorce would hurt his reputation, and that
she, plaintiff, should kill herself if she really loved him.

	(c) That at said time and place, said Hubbard systemati-
cally prevented plaintiff from sleeping continuously for a period
of over four days, and then in her agony, furnished her with a
supply of sleeping pills, all resulting in a nearness to the
shadow of death. That the foregoing was a frequent occurence [sic]
during the married life of the parties.

        (d) That at said time and place, plaintiff became numb
and lost consciousness, and was thereafter taken by said Hubbard to
the Hollywood Leland Hospital, where she was kept under a vigilant
guard from friend and family under an assumed name, for five
days.

        (e) That shortly following Christmas, 1950, said Hubbard

                             - 4 -


violently strangled plaintiff and sadistically ruptured the
eustachian tube of her left ear, resulting in the impairment of
her hearing. That such strangulation of plaintiff was a frequent
practice on the part of said Hubbard.

	(f) That in January, 1951, at Palm Springs, while
plaintiff was getting out of an automobile operated by said Hubbard
he intentionally started the said car in gear, thus propelling
plaintiff to the pavement resulting in serious personal injury.

	(g) That plaintiff and her medical advisors, following
the foregoing incidents, concluded that said Hubbard was hopelessly
insane, and crazy, and that there was no present hope for said
Hubbard, or any reason for her to indure [sic] further; that competent
medical advisors recommended that said Hubbard be committed to
a private sanitarium for psychiatric observation and treatment
of a mental ailment known as paranoid schizophrenia; that
plaintiff, on the 23rd day of February, 1951, caused the national
executive officer of the Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation at
Elizabeth, New Jersey, to be advised of said preliminary diagnosis
and urgent need for treatment; that said national officer immedi-
ately advised said Hubbard of said diagnosis.

	(h) That at 11;00 o'clock P.M., on said 23rd day of
February, 1951, said Hubbard, together with defendant Frank B.
Dessler, head of the Los Angeles Dianetic Foundation, abducted the
infant child of the parties, Alexis from her crib, and deposited
said infant in West Los Angeles with defendant Vince Mc Gonigle
under the assumed name of Anne Marie Olson, and concealed said
infant from plaintiff until this day. That this was admitted by
said Dessler in the habeas corpus proceedings filed on the 10th
day of April, 1951 entitled In re Alexis Valorie Hubbard, Los
Angeles Superior Court Number H.C. 35879.

	(i) That said Hubbard, Dessler and defendant Richard B.
De Mille, having secreted said infant child, feloniously dragged

                             - 5 -


plaintiff out of her bed attired only in her night gown, it then being
1;00 o'clock A.M., of the morning of the 24th day of February, 1951,
and by the use of threats, strangulation, torture, and false promises
to return her child to her, carried and kidnapped plaintiff to Yuma,
Arizona, all as is detailed at length in the habeas corpus
proceeding above mentioned.

	(j) That plaintiff has ever since sought the
whereabouts of her infant child, and has consulted attorneys, police,
sheriffs, Federal Bureau Of Investigation agents, and courts, and has
brought said habeas corpus proceedings; that said Hubbard and his
attorneys refuse any information as to the whereabouts of her infant
child, unless she goes back to live with said Hubbard, an alternative
that means certain continued torture and possible death, a predicament
no good woman, wife and mother should have to face.

	(k) That through all her trials and tribulations, and up
until the month of February, 1951, plaintiff bore her suffering and
sorrows in silence and even now would not bare the truth to the
world, except for the compelling advice of her attorney, Caryl
Warner, that she tell the truth for the truth will make her free, and
the truth alone, will bring back her baby, if alive.

	(l) That by reason of the foregoing crazy misconduct
of said Hubbard, plaintiff is in hourly fear of both the life of
herself and of her infant daughter, who she has not seen for two
months.

	That all of said acts on the part of said Hubbard towards
the plaintiff have been without cause or justification, and without 
the consent of the plaintiff, and have caused her great mental anguish
and horrible physical suffering. 

                              VI

	That the custody of said infant child Alexis should be
awarded to plaintiff, without reservation or condition; that the Court
should order and compel said Hubbard to submit to legitimate

                             - 6 -


psychiatric examination in the interests of tile welfare and safety
of said minor child, who is secreted by Hubbard someplace in North
America.

                              VII

	That said Hubbard is an able-bodied man, and is well able
to support and provide for plaintiff and their child; that by
reason thereof, said Hubbard should be ordered to pay to plaintiff
reasonable support for plaintiff and said infant child during the
pendency of this action, and thereafter pay permanent alimony and
child support; that in addition thereto, said Hubbard should be
ordered to pay a reasonable sum as and for attorney's fees and
costs of suit; that a lien should be impressed upon the real
property hereinafter described to secure payment of the sums allow-
ed herein.

                              VIII

	That said Hubbard has harrassed [sic], injured and kidnapped
plaintiff as alleged herein, and has threatened to kill plaintiff;
that plaintiff is informed and believes, and upon such information
and belief alleges that said Hubbard, unless restrained from so
doing, will carry out his said threats, and will again injure and
molest plaintiff; that by reason thereof, the Court should restrain
said Hubbard from molesting or injuring plaintiff during the pendency
of this hearing of this cause, and upon the trial of this action,
the Court should permanently enjoin said Hubbard from committing any
of said acts in regard to plaintiff. 

                              IX

	That said Hubbard departed from the State of California
on the 24th day of February, 1951, and ever since has remained out-
side of California, for the purpose of evading the process of the
Court, and for the purpose of attempting to deprive plaintiff of
her marital rights herein; that said absence from the State on the
part of said Hubbard was and is for the purpose of resisting

                             - 7 -


plaintiff's efforts to enforce her said rights against said defendant
for support and maintenance for herself and her child and to obtain an
equitable division of the community property of the parties; that said
Hubbard has repeatedly threatened that he would stay out of
California so as to make it impossible for her to get any money or
support from him and to prevent her from sharing in the community
property of the parties, and said Hubbard has stated that he would
do everything in his power to deprive plaintiff. of all of her said
marital rights; that plaintiff is informed and believes, and upon
such information and belief, alleges that pursuant to said threats,
said Hubbard has concealed various community assets, and has placed
said assets in the name of Hubbard Dianetics Research Foundation, and
in the names of the other defendants named herein, and in the names of
other persons unknown to the plaintiff that said Hubbard will continue
to further hide and conceal said community property assets from
plaintiff unless prevented from doing so by the appointment of a
receiver herein; that by reason of the said acts of said Hubbard,
plaintiff has been compelled to exhaust her own personal estates and
to draw upon her family for support; that by reason thereof, plaintiff
is without adequate funds for her own support or the support of her
child, or to prosecute this action; that all of the acts heretofore
set forth on the part of said Hubbard were perpetrated intentionally
and willfully and for the express purpose of defrauding plaintiff of
her said marital rights, and to unjustly and fraudulently deprive
plaintiff of any and all of her rights whatsoever, and to render her
helpless and subject to his complete and arbitrary will and
domination.

                               X

	That said receiver should be empowered to take over,
operate, and sell the defendant Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation
of California, Inc., property at 2300 South Hoover Street, Los

                             - 8 -


Angeles, California, and more particularly described as;
          Lot 6 of Belgravia Tract, in the City of
          Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, State
          of California, 8S per map in Book 23,
          Page 54 of Miscellaneous Records of said
          County, and a portion of Lot 3, Block 22,
          of Hancock's Survey in said City and
          County of Los Angeles, as per map recorded
          in Book 2, page 108 of Miscellaneous
          Records of said county;
that said receiver should be allowed to pay to plaintiff such sums
as the Court may allow for the support of plaintiff and the minor
child, and for her attorney's fees and costs incurred herein; that
plaintiff has no plain, speedy or adequate remedy at law other
then the appointment Of a receiver, for the reasons set forth
herein.

                               XI

	That the true names or capacities, whether individual
corporate, associate or otherwise, of defendants Doe One through
Doe Tens inclusive, are unknown to plaintiffs who there ore sues
said defendants by such fictitious names, and will as, leave to
amend this complaint to show their true names and capacities when
same have been ascertained.

              AND FOR A SECOND, SEPARATE AND FURTHER
           CAUSE OF ACTION, plaintiff alleges and says;

                               I

	Plaintiff refers to Paragraphs I, II, III, IV, V, VI,
and VII of her First Cause of Action and by reference makes them a
part hereof.

                               II

That plaintiff believes herself to be the lawfully
wedded wife of said defendant L. Ron Hubbard, in that she entered

                             - 9 -


into said marriage in good faith, all as is alleged herein; that in
the event the Court should find that she is not legally married to
said defendant, plaintiff in such an event alleges that said
marriage should be annuled [sic], and that she be awarded damages as
hereinafter set forth; that said defendant wilfully [sic] and
intentionally caused plaintiff to believe that she was his lawfully
wedded wife, and if she in fact is not, said Hubbard in such an
event should be ordered to pay the damages prayed for herein. 

                              III

	That plaintiff, believing that she was the lawfully wedded
wife of said Hubbard, over a period of five years, devoted her life to
said Hubbard, and served as wife, mother, housekeeper, author's
assistant, and pursuant thereto, washed dishes, cleared floors,
scrubbed the floors and walls, cooked and served meals for said
Hubbard, bore him a child, [loaned him over $20,000 - crossed out], and
otherwise subjected herself to the course of cruelty alleged
herein; that by reason thereof, the chances of plaintiff for
happiness in life, and chances for a normal marriage have been
diminished, and plaintiff has been prevented from following a
profession of her choice, and has been so deprived of the "golden
years of a woman's life", and by reason thereof, she has been
damaged in the sum of $100,000.00 a year, making a total of
$500,000.00 in all, if in fact it be found that she is not the
lawfully wedded wife of said Hubbard, and has been subjected to
the shame of a bigamous marriage.

                              IV

That in the event it be found that plaintiff is not the
lawfully wedded wife of said Hubbard, plaintiff should be accorded
the right of a putative wife, and by reason thereof, should be
allowed the same community property rights and interests in and
to the property acquired by the plaintiff and the said Hubbard,
following said ceremonial marriage on the 10th day of August,

                             - 10 -


1946, all as is prayed for herein.

	WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays judgment against defendant,
L. Ron Hubbard, as follows;

	(1) For a Judgment of divorce from said defendant,
that the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between
said parties be dissolved;

	(2) That the custody of the minor child of the
marriage, Alexis Valorie Hubbard, be awarded to plaintiff;

	(3) That defendant L. Ron Hubbard be ordered to pay
to plaintiff reasonable alimony and support, and further
provide reasonable support and maintenance for the minor child
of the said marriage, Alexis Valorie Hubbard;

	(4) That the community property of the parties hereto be
equitably apportioned, and the right, title and claim of interest
of defendants herein other than said defendant Hubbard, be
determined and adjudicated.

	(5) That a lien be impressed upon the real property of
said defendant Hubbard, to secure the payment of the sums of the
alimony and support allowed herein;

	(6) That reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit
be awarded plaintiff and her counsel, and that said defendant be
ordered to pay the same.

	(7) That in the event it be held that plaintiff is
not a resident of the State of California, for the prescribed
period, in such an event plaintiff prays that a decree of
separate maintenance be entered herein, in lieu of a divorce;

	(8) That the Court appoint a receiver herein with
customary powers to take over, manage, operate, and sell the
business and properties of the community estate of the parties
including the real property described in the complaint, said
property to be held by said receiver subject to the order and
direction of the Court, and that all defendants herein be ordered

                              - 11 -


and directed to pay to said receiver, any community funds and
deliver any community property they have in their possession,
and that said receiver to be appointed ex parte, and that upon
notice, said appointment of said receiver be confirmed and made
permanent;

	(9) That said defendant Hubbard be restrained from
injuring, molesting, or harming plaintiff, and be restrained from
interfering with the custody of the minor child, and that upon
the trial of the cause, said restraining order be made permanent;

	(10) That said Hubbard be restrained from concealing,
dissipating, transfering [sic], or hiding any of the community property
assets or property of the parties hereto; and

        (11) That if said marriage be held bigamous, that it be
annuled;

	(12) That plaintiff be awarded damages in the sum of
$500,000, if said marriage be found to be invalid;

	(13) That said Hubbard be ordered to submit to a
psychatric [sic] examination as a protection to said infant child; and

	(14) That plaintiff be awarded any such other and
further relief as is meet and proper.

                             WARNER & JACKSON

                                 [signed: Caryl Warner]
                             By: ________________
                                   Caryl Warner
                             Attorneys for Plaintiff

                              - 12 -


STATE OF CALIFORNIA      )
County of Los Angeles    ) ss.


	SARA NORTHRUP HUBBARD being by me first duly sworn,
deposes and says: that she is the plaintiff in the above
entitled action; that she has read the foregoing Complaint
for Divorce and knows the contents thereof, and that the same
is true of her own knowledge, except as to the matters which are
therein stated upon her information or belief, and as to those
matters she believes it to be true.

                                    [signed: Sara Northrup Hubbard]
                                    _____________________ 
                                    Sara Northrup Hubbard


Subscribed and sworn before me
this 23rd day of April, 1951.

[signed: B. R. Trout]
______________________________

Notary Public in and for said	              (SEAL)
County of Los Angeles, State of
California

                              - 13 -

 

 Ron denounces his wife to the FBI, March 1951

As early as 1940, L. Ron Hubbard had found that a useful method of causing problems for those he disliked was to denounce them to the authorities (he would have had a ball in Soviet Russia). By 1951, he was obsessed with the "Red Scare" and was, if anything, more McCarthyite than McCarthy.

The anti-communist hysteria gave him an opportunity to do something about his belief that the Communists were trying to "get him".

On 3 March 1951, he denounced fifteen of his staff to the FBI. At the top of the list were his wife and her lover, Miles Hollister.

Source:

 

Ron has an interview with the FBI, March 1951

When the FBI received a letter from L. Ron Hubbard denouncing his wife Sara as a "suspected communist" and "drug addict", they followed it up with an interview. The following document records the outcome of the interview:

Source: http://www.spaink.net/cos/LRH-bio/sarafbi3.gif

     

 

Ron offers a $10,000 reward for clearing his wife, March 1951

By 1951, L. Ron Hubbard's relations with his wife Sara were at a low ebb. He had taken a mistress, he had kidnapped his wife and daughter, he had attempted to have Sara declared insane and he had denounced her to the FBI as a suspected Communist. Touchingly, he made a final attempt to cure her of the "aberrations" which he believed were driving her into the arms of her "Communist" lover, Miles Hollister, and in the following telegram offered a $10,000 reward to any Dianetics auditor who could "clear" her.

 

Ron believes "they" are after him,May 1951

L. Ron Hubbard's paranoia reached a fever pitch by mid-1951, with his Dianetics Foundation beset by creditors, criticised by the media and medical profession for its "quackery" and under scrutiny for being a "psycho-sexual racket" (sic). He believed that a sinister Communist conspiracy was behind his troubles. At the time, he was having a sporadically passionate affair with a pretty 20-year-old Dianeticist, Barbara Kaye, with whom he was planning to elope. She soon realised that Ron was, in her own words, "disturbed". In a 1986 interview, she said:

    He was highly paranoid and would be rushing along the street with me and I would say, "Why are you walking so fast?" He'd look over his shoulder and say, "Don't you know what it's like to be a target ?"

    At all times he thought the American Psychological Association and the AMA and CIA had hit men after him... he thought everyone was after him. This was long before the IRS was after him. No one was after him at that time, but he certainly had delusions.

The following telegram vividly illustrates Ron's mental state:

 

Scientology infiltrating the US Government.

Secret minute from Ron in Clearwater, Nov 1975

The Sea Org's sailing days finally came to an end in the summer of 1975. With his flagship Apollo laid up in the Bahamas, L. Ron Hubbard decided that it was time to found a "land base". Clearwater was chosen to be the lucky recipient of the Church of Scientology's largesse - perhaps Ron was attracted by the town's name.

The following document shows that his 1967 assertion that he had "relinquished the day-to-day management of the Church" was totally untrue; he was deeply, personally, involved in setting up Scientology in Clearwater. The last page is particularly interesting, as this is the order which led directly to Scientology infiltrating the US Government.

(We apologise for the poor quality of this nth-generation copy.)

Hubbard uses a large number of acronyms - in order of appearance, this is a partial list of expansions (any amendments would be welcomed):
 
FH - Fort Harrison Hotel
UC - United Churches, Scientology front group used to buy property in Clearwater
SLD - ?
F&F - ?
CW - Clearwater
IRS - Internal Revenue Service
DC - Washington D.C. org
PROAC - ?
USB - ?
AG - Assistant Guardian
PRs - Public Relations staff
SCN - Scientology
CSG - ?
B1 - Bureau One of the Guardian's Office
GO - Guardian's Office

 

Scientology infiltrates the US Government, Dec 1975

The Church of Scientology had believed (correctly, as it turned out) that it was under intense scrutiny by the US Government and state authorities. In a minute of 26 November 1975, L. Ron Hubbard ordered the Guardian's Office (the "security agency" of Scientology) to

    "very quickly pre-alert [me to] any trouble so I can go fishing until you handle.

    AND WE COUNT ON YOU GUYS TO MOW IRS DOWN AND WIN ACROSS THE BOARDS."

These instructions were followed to the letter. The Guardian's Office initiated what Church lawyers described, in a 1979 case in England, as "robust American methods of defence" (sic).

The following document, "GO Program Order 158", was a detailed breakdown of how Hubbard's order was to be implemented. Its circulation was restricted to just six people (including the authors) to maintain security. All six, plus five others including Hubbard's wife Mary Sue, were convicted in 1979 of crimes against the US Government and served several years in jail; upon their release they were formally expelled from the Church.

Oddly, though, one of their number, Dick Weigand - also one of the authors of the following document - has been spotted in Colombia selling Scientology to the Colombian armed forces.

GO Program Order 158 is notable for its casual flouting of the law; note items 12, 14 and 21 in particular. It was clearly intended not simply to alert Hubbard to any legal trouble but to alert him to any inconvenience whatsoever, no matter how illegal the means might be. (The quality of this scan is rather poor, for which we apologise).

 

Ron Hubbard dixit: «I am utterly unable to approach anything»

 

LA SCIENTOLOGIE DANS LES MÉDIAS

Les articles médias sont classés par pays
Cliquez sur le drapeau de votre choix
 

Suisse

France

Belgique

Allemagne

Espagne

Danemark

Roumanie

USA

Russie

Italie

Canada

Hollande

Luxembourg

Autriche

Suède

Grèce

Angleterre

Hongrie

Maroc

Serbie

New Zealand

Israel

Australia

 India

Anonymous

 

Un must: "Ron Hubbard, le gourou démasqué"

Ce livre de Russell Miller révèle la face cachée de la scientologie. On y découvre un Ron Hubbard, malade, mythomane et poursuivi par la justice. Il est disponible en format pdf ou html sur notre site. Nous avons également publié une version résumée.

 

Témoignage de
Jean-Luc Barbier
LE GRAVIS
CP 224
CH - 2900 Porrentruy 2
 
contact@anti-scientologie.ch
 
Les textes de notre site peuvent être utilisés
pour tout usage non commercial
Anti scientologie
est hébergé par

TiZoo Sàrl

 

[Accueil][Objectifs][Nouveautés][Pétitions][Témoignages][Faire un don][Articles médias][Jura et les sectes][La manipulation]