|
|
|
|
Les manipulations de la scientologie concernant la justice Les règlements de Ron Hubbard pour faire face à un procès
Comment la scientologie attaque ses "ennemis" et instrumentalise la justice (évaluation Goodrich - 6 juin 1973) Mike McClaughry interview about the «Goodrich evaluation» of Ron Hubbard (June 2, 2000)
|
|
L'ÉVALUATION POUR LE PROCÈS GOODRICH Texte confidentiel de la scientologie saisi par le FBI Cette "Evaluation" Goodrich est un texte secret de la scientologie qui a pour but de mettre un terme aux attaques d'ex-scientologues en justice. Il a été rédigé par le fondateur de la scientologie: Lafayette Ron Hubbard (LRH). Document original en anglais Ce document démontre comment les scientologues se moquent de tous les systèmes judiciaires et ce qu'ils plannifient pour se débarrasser des plaignants, de leurs avocats, des juges ainsi que des médias susceptibles de traiter leurs affaires. Ce document secret devrait être communiqué à tous les juges en charge de dossiers concernant la scientologie. L'actuel dirigeant de la scientologie, David Miscavige, se sert toujours de ces recommandations pour son "Office des Affaires Spéciales". Le traducteur n'a pas traduit certains passages souvent trop compliqués à expliquer à des non-scientologues. Il a ajouté certaines explications [entre parenthèses carrées]. Les lignes du type:
indiquent les services ou individus destinataires des ordres les précédant (= les destinataires dans une note de service interne d'une société). Les éléments significatifs de la dangerosité de la scientologie sont en bleu.
SECRET 6 Juin 1975 [la date réelle est 6 juin 1973, ndt] L'Evaluation pour le Procès Goodrich [ndt: Evaluation est à prendre ici dans le sens scientologique. Il s'agit d'une méthode compliquée qu'Hubbard a inventée de toutes pièces, mais qu'on pourrait définir ainsi: plan ou programme composé de buts, étapes, sous étapes et plans connexes eux-mêmes composés d'étapes, etc. Accessoirement, sa méthode d'estimation et maniement – «EVALUATION»- d'une situation est si compliquée qu'on comprend pourquoi, dans l'évaluation que voici, on rencontre nombre de fois les mêmes ordres et les mêmes sujets] Policy [Policy ou PL= en scientologie, règle générale écrite, politique, règle administrative ou autre règle que les scientologues considèrent comme un ordre à suivre absolument, ndt]: Evaluer des situations avant de planifier des actions et de manier Enquêter très à fond et préparer toutes les actions judiciaires avant d'agir. Préparer complètement toutes les actions judiciaires, les profits seront en proportion de la préparation. SITUATION: Une plainte comprenant une Class Action [action américaine incluant des plaignants groupés] est déposée par un certain Goodrich de San Francisco contre la scientologie pour 500 millions de dollars. DONNEES: Une étude préliminaire révèle des séries de données et de préparations omises. On n'a pas fait d'évaluation convenable. Les conseils du service Intelligence [Intell ou Intelligence: les services secrets de la secte, ndt] démontrent des omissions grossières, y compris à propos des enquêtes normales menées sur les individus impliqués. Le plaignant, ses cohortes et avocats ont été complètement omis en tant que cibles dans le planning judiciaire. Il y a une cible incorrecte à propos des livres, ainsi que du temps omis. Rien ne peut être fait d'utile à propos des livres pour CE procès. Les points 1 à 4 de la lettre du 4 juin 73 s'appliqueront avec réalisme aux FUTURS procès. [la "cible incorrecte" dont parle Hubbard est lui-même car il est cité comme défenseur dans le procès étant donné que ses ouvrages promettent des résultats. Il cherche donc un moyen d'échapper aux aspects du procès qui le mettent en cause, ndt] Le plan de l'avocat, bien qu'excellent en soi, ne colle pourtant pas avec CE procès mais s'applique à n'importe quel procès. Des actions compromettantes pouvant provoquer le rejet, telles conspiration, enquète du gouvernement ou autres ont été omises. Il y a une grossière erreur de planification. On suppose que l'opposant se base sur un fondement de destruction de la scientologie, dont les étapes de ce qui POURRAIT être fait en ce sens sont précisées. Aucune preuve n'existe que cette situation soit réelle, en dehors du fait que le plaignant peut l'espérer. L'erreur en général, c'est d'ima- giner que le plaignant fera certaines étapes splendidement planifiées qui le conduiront vers cette science et peut très bien avoir d'autres choses en tête. Donc, placer toute la défense afin de repousser une attaque hypothétique peut produire une sévère défaite. Temps omis, Séquence incorrecte, mauvaise cible. [ces trois choses sont termes 'techniques' d'Hubbard dans sa série de bulletins sur la "logique", dénommée 'Data Series', ndt] On a omis une idée brillante qui balaierait tout ceci, c'est une autre omission du service Intell [Intell ou Intelligence: les services secrets de la secte, ndt] concernant des rapports de crédit, d'implication dans d'autres procès pour escroquerie, relations familiales, possibles interdictions, sources de données, sources de financement.[en bref, espionnez tout ce que vous pouvez en ce qui concerne les plaignants, et servez-vous de tout ce qui pourrait les déstabiliser, ndt.] EVALUATION GENERALE Le plaignant a omis des plaignants réels, s'il y en a. On trouve des données inexactes dans de maigres rapports d'Intell antérieurs [Intell ou Intelligence: les services secrets de la secte, ndt]; on présume que des agences d'état s'acharnent, y compris des gouvernements étrangers, "personne n'a réagi" dans ces agences. "Il y a un gros poisson" de retour derrière tout ça, mais leur procès est mal fagoté selon l'estimation juridique et il est farci d'erreurs techniques. C'est en contradiction avec un gros poisson, car il ne permettrait ni ne collerait un procès mal ficelé en justice. Il manque les transcriptions des rapports de membres de la Sea Org déclarés suppressifs ou de membres d'autres orgs qui auraient pu avoir affaire à Goodrich. Dossier A: il est très bien résumé. D'après les preuves dont on dispose, il n'est pas complètement utilisé, car en soi, il contient des données suffisantes pour gagner ce procès au fond, et si on l'examine bien, et qu'on s'en SERT il écarte le risque de procès puisque le plaignant s'est plusieurs fois blessé à la tête AVANT d'être audité et qu'il a a par ailleurs chuté à moto et s'est blessé à la tête tout au début de ses auditions. Plus important encore, il a envisagé de détruire la scientologie le 25 août 69, on a un témoin de cela, mais le plaignant a pourtant refusé un remboursement et a continué, ce qui démontre que son seul intérêt est de détruire la scientologie. En examinant la plainte et les ouvrages cités, on constate du temps omis et des faux rapports, dont le temps omis est également falsifié. Le plaignant a signé deux lettres de succès disponibles dans le dossier. [la scientologie fait écrire des quantités de satisfecits obligatoires à ses clients, appelés Lettres de succès, ndt] L'épouse Lois Goodrich fait preuve d'hostilité extrême et elle revient et repart, selon le dossier A. Elle est un rien dominatrice, menace de "marshals federals" et d'autres officiels et elle est la source de l'illusion qu'il s'agirait d'un cas très vaste auquel s'intéresseraient des gouvernements. Cela s'avère faux, en tant que "outpoint" [Outpoint : litt. "point qui n'est pas en place", signifie simplement une anomalie dans une situation] Le plaignant est resté trop longtemps pour qu'il s'agisse d'une action complotée par des intérêts extérieurs. C'est manifestement lui qui l'a imaginée. Il est PTS type III ['malade mental' en scientologais, ndt] et a des problèmes avec sa mère et sa femme. Quant au traitement, le dossier démontre qu'il n'a reçu qu'un peu de dianétique et qu'on l'a laissé passer vite fait sur les Grades [niveaux d'auditon d'académie 0 à 4 qui précèdent les niveaux avancés, ndt]. MAIS IL A PASSE LA PLUPART DE SON TEMPS DANS LES ORGS A ESSAYER DE MANIER SA VIE DOMESTIQUE ET N'Y A PAS REÇU DE MANIEMENT COMPLET. Il ne se comportait pas assez bien par lui-même pour pouvoir être audité. C'est quelque chose qu'on peut souligner. [Hubbard accuse donc l'individu que la scientologie a promis d'améliorer de ne pas s'améliorer par lui-même, un classique qu'on rencontre sous nombre d'autres formes en scientologie, ndt] Ils ont tous deux refusé les remboursements. On doit trouver des CLAUSES DE RENONCEMENT signées par ces gens, peut-être en existe-t-il plusieurs, expliquant qu'ils n'étaient engagés dans rien d'autre sinon dans une activité religieuse. C'est omis dans le dossier et dans le plan. Qu'eux-mêmes aient omis d'en faire part peut être signalé comme une falsification. [Hubbard rejette la faute d'un oubli - si tant est qu'il y en ait un - d'une étape sur laquelle la secte n'insiste absolument pas quand elle contraint ses clients à signer ces documents. En réalité, tous les ouvrages utilisés sont de 1950-1951, et les soins psychosomatiques ne font pas partie des offres de services de l'église. [mensonge, puisque tous les ouvrages d'hubbard parlent de soins psychosomatiques - voir entre autres le nouveau titre de la Dianétique en France, "la Dianétique, puissance de l'esprit sur le corps" ayant remplacé "la science moderne de la santé mentale" ] Dans toutes les défenses, on a omis que LRH n'est ni officier ni directeur, les matériaux étant seulement là pour l'usage correct. [faux: tout scientologue savait rapidement que tout écrit d’Hubbard devait être obéi sans discussion, et les nouvelles signatures ‘conseil d’administration des églises de scientologie ‘ ne faisaient que remplacer les mêmes documents signés d’Hubbard documents rebaptisés et resignés Hubbard peu après] Le plaignant a falsifié les statuts légaux, car ces églises sont six entités juridiques différentes. Le plaignant a pris des services dans SIX entités. [Hubbard sait fort bien que le plaignant ignore très probablement tout des entités/orgas/organisations scientologues, mais il l'accuse néanmoins de falsification, ndt] Omis également, ce fait éclatant: selon le dossier A, le plaignant s'est continuellement engagé dans plusieurs autres pratiques si bien qu'on ne peut dire s'il a souffert plutôt de l'une que d'une autre. [En scientologie, on appelle 'autres pratiques' tout ce qui n'est pas scientologie pure, c'est à dire la médecine, les religions,la psychologie etc., toutes choses interdites de facto, ndt. Cela viole par ailleurs l’article 18 du pacte de l’ONU] Le plaignant a falsifié sa première White Form, en omettant le fait qu'on découvrit ensuite, c'est à dire qu'on l'avait déclaré fou (probable) et incarcéré dans une institution (certain) à 7 ans et que (probable) il était allé à d'autres moments dans une autre institution, un fait inconnu. Il semble que le plaignant ait été hypnotisé à plusieurs reprises avant de venir à l'église. L'église ne pratique pas l'hypnose: sa plainte est fausse. [La White form est une liste de questions indiscrètes qu'on pose sous électromètre pour établir 'l'historique' de quelqu'un, ndt] Le plaignant dit avoir été handicapé par "une explosion dans le cerveau" et prétendait qu'il ne pouvait pas travailler, mais quand il a été suspendu à l'organisation d'ASHO, il a travaillé pendant sept mois sur un tanker. [cette affaire «d’explosion dans le cerveau» est typique du genre de sensations imaginaires qu’on rencontre durant les séances d’audition scientologues, ndt] Ceci et d'autres éléments démontrent que l'on manie DEUX situations dans le cas présent. Donc, voici deux évaluations séparées, basées sur les outpoints ci-dessus. GO SITUATION - EVALUATION G1 Policy: Evaluer intégralement toutes les situations majeures.[ces quelques points non-traduits sont sans intérêt ou influence procédurale, ndt] SITUATION G1: The GO US is apprehensive about the Goodrich suit and advocating measures which will not completely handle with certainty, but which depend on technical legal expertise - which they have and which they should employ and which they are employing. DATA: As above. STATS: Very good legal stats. OUTPOINT COUNT: The primary outpoint is omitted data. This outpoint occurs over and over and over and appears in the form of unutilised (omitted from use) data as well. These outpoints in the majority occur in the area of Intelligence. WHY: Intelligence Bu head not providing sufficient information even of a routine nature to permit legal to form solid reassuring planning that will lead to an inevitable win. SECONDARY WHY: GO US is miscalling "Evaluation" and is doing brief off the cuff SITUATION-WHY-HANDLING write ups which are not pure evaluation and do not use outpoint counts or the Data Series in full. IDEAL SCENE: US GO calm, confident and effective in all Bus. HANDLING: [ndt: ces étapes suivantes A.1 à I.9 s'occupent de la 'situation' interne de la scientologie et recommandent d'une part de continuer à s'occuper du cas, d'autre part de s'occuper du personnel de Intell grâce aux procédés scientologues. Cela ne présente pas d'intérêt hors scientologie et n'influe pas sur les résultats ou la technique judiciaire] A. 1. Continue the legal defence as it is proceeding as it is technically sound in its legal strategy and, considering that it is lacking even elementary Intelligence data, is buying enough delay to remedy lack of proper data and evaluation.
B. 2. Run out all ARC Breaks, then w/hs of omission and commission on the head of Intelligence. Handle any personal problems that appear. Do this instantly. C. 3. Do the same for any other Intelligence personnel.
D. 4. Promptly look over Intelligence and at once remedy any reason for their organi- zational troubles.
E. 5. Get existing Int staff flat out at once on the Goodrich case. Augment or handle personnel/finance as needed so as not to upset any other operation.
F. 6. Produce any and all data needed for a complete, sound, winning defence.
G. 7. Keep Legal continuously briefed.
H. 8. Method 4 and review all [LRH] data re expertise in the Int Bu and as written for them especially.
I. 9. Send an aide from Flag to instruct all US GO personnel on the Data Series. ____________________ GO SITUATION EVALUATION G2 Policy: Faire traîner le procès tant que le fond est incertain ou jusqu'à ce que le fond soit clairement établi. [en d'autres termes, Hubbard exige qu'on fasse traîner un procès aussi longtemps qu'on n'est pas certain du résultat sur le fond ce qui ne l'empêche pas de parler ici même bien plus souvent de la forme que du fond.] SITUATION: Un procès a été lancé contre l'église de scientologie et plusieurs de ses cadres principaux par un Robert Edmund Puthoff Goodrich devant le Tribunal supérieur de San Francisco [équivalent d'un TGI en France]; il demande des dommages personnels et une Class Action, alléguant des escroqueries dans les livres et publicités et en tentant de faire exploser un procès ordinaire en une action tout à fait hors de proportion de ses "mérites", mais qui constituerait un tort et établirait un précédent si on la perdait. DATA: Voir résumé précédent. STATS: De très bonnes statistiques légales à jour. OUTPOINTS: Les très nombreux outpoints s'ajoutent aux faux outpoints. Même lorsque des données sont omises, c'est pour falsifier. Ce type d'outpoints est presque exclusif au tribunal, exception faite de la cible incorrecte consistant à y poursuivre la CofS. WHY / [le Pourquoi: terme technique utilisé dans les Evaluations, censé expliquer complètement une occurence d'un quelconque phénomène pour la secte.]: Goodrich et ses supporters ont démarré un faux projet sur de fausses bases, falsifient les témoignages et les dossiers, avec l'espoir rapace d'obtenir de l'argent. [affirmation infondée probablement destinée à donner le moral aux exécutants, ndt] WHY SECONDAIRE: Les orgs sont raisonnables quant aux PTS et à la policy sur les remboursements et le maniement des psychotiques. SCENE IDEALE: Le cas intégralement évalué, l'évaluation étant ensuite efficacement imposée, avec une victoire finale seulement valable pour boucher les trous, servant d'exemple en matière de Relations Publiques, afin de restreindre des attaques postérieures. MANIEMENT: J. 1. Le service juridique doit s'arranger pour que l'opposition reste sur la défensive et qu'on obtienne le temps nécessaire par les méthodes actuellement utilisées ainsi que via le planning juridique tel qu'on le trouve au point (d) -stratégie- de la lettre du 3 juin 1973, avec une exception: utilisez par tous moyens "Découverte" sur les lignes juridiques [internes] mais augmentez-les grâce au fichier A2 Piste du Temps de la lettre de juin 73 et insistez pour obtenir de Int [Ici, c’est probablement d’Intell qu’il s’agit, le service renseignements/espionnage de la secte, ndt] davantage de données puis servez-vous en. Voir G2-A. joint
K. 1A. Stratégie pour les actions défensives. Voir G2-AA.
L. 2. Si le procès vient en audience ou devant les juges, servez-vous de 2G-B plus loin en supplément de toute autre approche estimée efficace par le service juridique.
M. 3. Menez si possible le plaignant ou ses associés à déclarer sous serment quelque chose qu'on pourra prouver comme faux. Développez ces données depuis Int ou d'autres sources et amenez-les à affirmer quelque chose de faux, puis prouvez que c'est faux et demandez qu'ils soient inculpés de parjure.
N. 4. Travaillez le cas afin d'arriver à une contre-accusation pénale, par n'importe quel moyen.
O. 5. Contre-attaquez en justice sur la base de G2-C ou par n'importe quel moyen découvert afin de faire un exemple.
P. 6. Elaborez une méthode de défense de LRH et utilisez-la, de préférence en le faisant ôter au plus vite de la liste des défenseurs; voir G2-6
Q. 7. Instituez très vite les étapes 1-3 de la lettre à M du 4 juin 73 par B. [on retrouve fréquemment mention de cette lettre, qui doit certainement avoir un intérêt considérable, mais ce document a dû demeurer dans les documents saisis par le FBI en 1977, mais non utilisés ou dévoilés. Ici, on pourrait supposer que M est Mary Sue Hubbard, l'épouse de Hubbard, tandis que B était vraisemblablement un cadre dirigeant du Guardian Office]
R. 8. Composez, avec l'aide du service juridique, un démenti n'invalidant pas le travail de l'église, mais expliquant que, bien qu'elle soit tout à fait libre de le faire, elle ne s'engage pas dans le maniement psychosomatique et qu'elle n'accepte pas les gens pour traiter leurs maladies mentales ou physiques et qu'elle offre du conseil spirituel et religieux, mais que parvenir à une amélioration dépend de la personne elle-même; que l'électromètre ne fait rien en soi, mais sert de guide aux ministres de l'église; que l'auteur [Hubbard, ndt] ne fait que relater ses observations suite à son travail et qu'il n'est pas responsable des promesses ou du mauvais usage de ces matérieaux etc; l'important étant que la personne lise ces matériaux sous sa propre responsabilité. Le but de tout ceci consiste à stopper la moindre possibilité que l'auteur ou l'église soit accusés d'escroquerie. Dessinez cela joliment avec un emplacement pour le nom de la personne "Ce livre appartient à_____", tout en petits caractères, mais avec beaucoup d'espace pour le nom de la personne. ================ [voici ce qu'on trouve en effet en 2008 dans les pré-pages des ouvrages scientologues: La SCIENTOLOGIE*, philosophie religieuse, contient des méthodes de conseil pastoral destinées à aider une personne à acquérir une plus grande connaissance d'elle-même, La mission de l'Eglise de Scientologie est simple: aider l'individu à atteindre une plus grande assurance et intégrité personnelle, lui permettant ainsi de vraiment gagner confiance et respect en lui-même et en ses semblables. Atteindre les bienfaits et les buts de la philosophie de Scientologie nécessite la participation dévouée de chaque personne, car ce n'est que par ses propres efforts qu'elle peut y parvenir. Ce livre fait partie des oeuvres et écrits religieux du Fondateur de la Scientologie, L. Ron Hubbard. Il est présenté au lecteur comme faisant partie de sa recherche personnelle sur la vie et l'application de celle-ci par d'autres, et devrait uniquement être interprété comme un compte rendu écrit de cette recherche, non comme un exposé de revendications faites par l'Eglise ou l'auteur. La philosophie de Scientologie et son précurseur, la technologie de Dianétique*, telles qu'elles sont pratiquées par l'Eglise, ne s'adressent qu'au "thétan" (esprit). Bien que l'Eglise, comme toutes les églises, soit libre de pratiquer la guérison spirituelle, elle ne le fait pas, car son but premier est d'accroître la conscience spirituelle pour tous. Pour cette raison, l'Eglise ne souhaite pas accepter les personnes qui désirent faire soigner leur maladies physiques ou leur démence, et préfère leur indiquer des spécialistes qualifiés d'autres organismes qui s'en occupent. L'électromètre Hubbard, Hubbard* E-Meter*, est un objet religieux utilisé au sein de l'Eglise pour la confession. Il ne fait rien par lui-même et n'est utilisé que par des ministres pour aider les paroissiens à localiser des zones de détresse ou de douleur spirituelles. CET OUVRAGE APPARTIENT À: ______________] [fin de citation]
S. 9. Faites étiqueter cela dans tous les ouvrages, en couverture intérieure. Tous pays.
T. 10. Faites poser l'avertissement légal / démenti avec "En soi, l'électromètre ne fait rien. Il sert seulement de guide aux ministres de l'église dans les confessions, puis continuez par l'avertissement émis par le tribunal, les deux énoncés étant placés de telle sorte qu'ils semblent provenir d'origines différentes, mais devant être lus ensemble, même s'ils sont différemment placés. [nota: la vraie raison de cette exigence d'Hubbard provient de la condamnation définitive de l'appareil par la Food & Drug administration, voir http://www.antisectes.net/kent-religion-fr.htm, (aller directement au point 77 du texte). On constatera que la secte, dans cet exemple, n'a ni obéi à Hubbard, ni au jugement ayant condamné l'appareil électromètre, car les mentions collées à l’appareil le sont au mauvais endroit (cachées), elles sont incomplètes et déformées par rapport à ce qu'ont demandé les juges dans 'US contre Device']
U. 11. Complétez et publiez Bona Fide. [Il s'agit ici très probablement des ' études' payées par la secte auprès de divers apologistes universitaires afin de prouver qu'elle serait une religion, ndt]
V. 12. Editez Dianétique, science moderne de la santé mentale, mettez-le à jour, ajoutez une discussion portant sur la période et sur le rôle de l'esprit. Republiez-le comme un "Nouvel ouvrage" daté de 1974. [note: en Français, le livre sera republié avec un titre perverti, il est devenu Puissance de l'Esprit sur le Corps".]
W. 13. Mettez à jour le livre de Garrison et imprimez-le. [il s'agit d'une pseudo-biographie, plutôt une hagiographie - d'Hubbard, commandée par ses services, ndt]
X. 14. Elaborez une campagne de courrier destinée à manier tous les scientologues passés ou hostiles.
Y. 15. Recueillez d'énormes quantités de gens existants [encore en scientologie?] liés à des Lettres de succès et choisissez en afin de faire des récits, en relation avec les livres et la littérature. Publiez sous forme de "Réussites grâce à la scientologie", avec une préface de l'éditeur - l'idée ici, c'est: "Nous n'avons pas dit à ces gens qu'ils pouvaient gagner". [ndt: C'est l'exacte inversion des faits, car tout au long de la littérature scientologue et des cours etc, on n'entend parler que de "gains", et il est d'autre part absolument interdit de parler de ce qui fâche, et l'on est très très souvent contraint à écrire des lettres de succès, voire des lettres au directeur général de la secte - auparavant, c'est Hubbard qui recevait ces courriers]
Z. 16. Revoyez ces programmes et ajoutez des cibles pouvant être suggérées ou conseillées. ____________________
Cible 1 - G2-A Le point-clé chez ces gens, c'est la fausseté. Cela ne s'applique pas qu'à ce procès, mais à leur vie entière, présente ou passée. IDEE BRILLANTE n° 1: Pour cette cible: En obtenant de Lois Goodrich par déposition en justice ou interrogatoire ou par d'autres voies, d'utiliser sa fixation sur les administrations, et en se servant des fausses déclarations de Lazaro disant qu'il y aurait une aide fédérale allant dans leur sens, démontrer un lien entre Goodrich et l'ex-chef de la FDA, ainsi que toute preuve pour affirmer - sinon, entamer une rumeur de conspiration lancée par d'autres gens qui ne soient pas plaignants, et établir quelque action illégale de leur fait, de préférence des vols de dossier, cambriolages, écoutes illégales et espionnage dans les orgs. Puis utilisez tout ceci grâce à une explosion de Relations Publiques afin de provoquer "une relaxe immédiate". Voir la lettre du 4 juin 73, TLM. A. (a) Découvrez tout lien entre Goodrich et l'homonyme de la FDA. [utiliser une homonymie comme moyen de recherche, surtout à propos d'un nom aussi répandu aux USA que Goodrich, paraît assez incroyable, ndt] ____________________ B. (b) Obtenez davantage d'information quant aux liens entre ces gens (i) leur crédit, (ii) leurs engagements passés, (iii) procès contre d'autres, (iv) implication dans le gouvernement, (v) casier judiciaire (vi) source de financement pour le procès (vii) escroquerie - genre dommage envers un employé, - (viii) développez une image complète de ces gens, de leurs finances et liens. Faites passer les données au service juridique au fur et à mesure. [ndt: espionnage… et cela se fait entre autres en utilisant les «confessions» et autres dossiers sur les clients, ndt] C. (c) Explorez comment effectuer l'idée brillante en A ci-dessus, en gardant en tête et en UTILISANT à cette étape les idées fausses de Loïs G et Lazarus, et en agissant comme si elles étaient exactes et que vous les croyiez (pour l'instant).
D. (d) Etablissez les pièces à soumettre, interrogatoire et étapes de déposition nécessaires pour développer et en fin de compte démonter le procès.
IDEE BRILLANTE G-2B: Goodrich a un passé psychiatrique. A 7 ans, ainsi qu'en 1967, et probablement bien d'autres fois. Utilisez cela pour le faire juger incapable civil et inapte à poursuivre en justice, ou servez-vous en pour invalider son témoignage et les pièces. Voir A, 2 juin 73 Piste du Temps. [espionnage encore, avec violation du secret médical en plus du secret de « confession », ndt] E. (e) Recueillez les dossiers et preuves de l'Institution à 7 ans, de l'hôpital de New York en 1967, de la visite du 18 septembre 1969 à Samuel Scarlet, du (MD 490 POst Stree SFO??) , par des moyens autorisés. Donnez-les au service juridique.
____________________ Cible 1 - G2AB continuation AF. (f) Obtenez les documents de la liste ci-dessous et donnez-les au service juridique.
AG. (g) Formulez les choses à soumettre au tribunal afin de demander un non-lieu sur la base de la folie du plaignant, et parce qu'il a falsifié sa demande d'acceptation [chez nous] en sachant bien que l'église n'accepte pas dans ses services les fous et les personnes ayant reçu des électrochocs, et alors qu'il savait qu'il aurait été refoulé si ces faits avaient été connus. Que sa conduite à l'église fut celle d'une personne malade mentalement (ne parlez pas encore de sa menace de destruction car ça doit être caché jusqu'à un possible procès). Ajoutez qu'il faut un non-lieu du fait de l'incapacité mentale du plaignant, qu'il n'existe pas de base pour un procès. Sous-entendez que ce fut la cause de l'interruption [des services scientologues, probablement, ndt], mais sous-entendez-le, pas plus.
(Documents nécessaires: Policy sur les cas psychotiques, exemple de décharge, WF. Ne pas donner la décharge signée du pc, qu'on conservera en cas de procès.) IDEE BRILLANTE: G2-C: Etablissez un monceau des mensonges qu'ont dit le plaignant, sa femme, et tous les autres afin qu'on puissse les utiliser pour créer une atmosphère de mensonge total qui servirait dans un procès à venir. Posez des questions lors des dépositions et questionnements supplémentaires destinées à provoquer des réponses incorrectes qu'on pourra ensuite démontre comme fausses. AH. (h) Localisez quoi que ce soit qui ne colle pas ou qui soit un mensonge dans la vie du plaignant ou de sa femme ou de sa mère. Donnez-le au service juridique.
AI. (i) Retravaillez toutes les données disponibles et essayez de voir comment vous en servir pour provoquer de fausses réponses et dépositions etc, et utilisez-les.
AJ. (j) Faites soigneusement une liste de toutes les réponses ou déclarations fausses du plaignant ou des gens qui lui sont liés, avec lieux et dates, surtout ceux qui témoignent sous serment, mais en n'omettant pas non plus ceux d'autres gens au cas où on pourrait s'en servir lors d'un procès.
G2-AA CIBLE 1A - ACTIONS DEFENSIVES On serait trop optimiste d'imaginer que le plaignant n'aura pas quelques crasses et vacheries à sortir sur la scien-. tologie, en évoquant toute sorte de gens ayant filé, en exposant des cadenas et des menottes, des témoignages "experts" de psychiatres, et tentant de faire des révélations choquantes aux médias. Il peut même exposer ces choses à la presse avant qu'elles viennent aux oreilles des tribunaux, de façon tout à fait démocratique, dans la plus pure tradition de l'Allemagne fasciste. On doit donc anticiper ces actions. On doit les manier brutalement pour ACQUERIR L'AVANTAGE EN PROUVANT UN PARJURE EVENTUEL, ou tout autre motif juridique. Mais soyez-en bien certains, c'est d'expérience que je parle, ces accusations sont FAUSSES. Ne tombez pas dans le piège de penser que les orgs ou les scientologues font ces choses sans y avoir été provoqués, si tant est qu'ils les fassent. Toutes les enquêtes que j'ai menées - et il y en a eu BEAUCOUP - ont montré que ces assauts de négativité contre les orgs et les gens étaient FAUX, et que même pour les plus graves, il y avait eu des provo- cations fantastiques. [il s’agit là d’une affirmation gratuite d’Hubbard, car il ne fait aucun doute que les provo- cations sont contenues dans toute sorte de documents internes du mouvement, en particulier celui-ci, ndt] C'est dans cette zone DEFENSIVE que Intell (Information) et Juridique doivent oeuvrer vite et furieusement, et la main dans la main. A part la technique d'invalidation judiciaire contre ces accusations et les moyens de les écarter sur des bases techniques, LA NORME, L'UNIQUE METHODE EFFICACE POUR MANIER CONSISTE A SE SERVIR DE CE QUE NOUS APPELONS " Technique de l'agent mort" [Dead Agent ou D.A. sont utilisés en scientologais, ndt] . On la définit comme dans le vieux livre chinois sur la guerre: lorsqu'il constate qu'un agent lui fournit des informations inexactes, l'ennemi le tue, d'où le terme "Agent Mort". En scientologie, cela signifie: ASSUMEZ ET PROUVEZ QUE TOUTE ACCUSATION EST FAUSSE ET OBTENEZ LES DOCUMENTS ET LES TEMOINS ET DEPOSITIONS POUR LE PROUVER. [ndt: on constate ici que les documents, témoins etc. n'ont pas à être vérifiés ni vrais] Cela signifie que toute accusation ou affirmation ne peut être contrée ou maniée qu'à partir du moment où Intell a taillé dans le vif et produit les documents contraires ou que les faits contraires sont démontrés grâce à des témoins. AK 1. Comprenez et servez-vous de ce qui précède.
AL. 2. Comprenez et servez-vous de ce qui précède.
AM. Demandez des délais jusqu'à ce que l'on puisse appliquer l'Agent Mort sur l’objet.
AN. 4. Obtenez les preuves inverses. NE LAISSEZ PAS PASSER LA MOINDRE ACCUSATION ! [ndt: Hubbard utilise le terme scientologais "entheta", qui, littéralement, signifie contre-survie, mais que la scientologie utilise presque exclusivement dans le sens de "anti-scientologie". ]
G2-6
Il n'y a aucune raison que LRH (Hubbard) soit encore nommé défendant dans ce procès. On doit faire une pétition pour qu'il soit ôté de la liste. Les faits sont là: Hubbard n'a pas été directeur ou officier d'aucune de ces orgs depuis trois années avant que Goodrich n'approche n'importe laquelle.[ndt: il s'agit d'une apparence pure: en 1982, tout scientologue ayant le minimum d'expérience savait que tout ce qu'écrivait Hubbard était parole d'évangile en scientologie, et que c'est par ces écrits qu'il dirigeait la secte à 100%] Il ne sait rien de Goodrich en tant que procès. Les ouvrages en question ont été écrits par LRH 19 et 20 ans avant que Goodrich n'entre en scène. Ils ont été écrits pour être publiés. Les dates des copyrights annoncées par Goodrich sont inexactes. [ndt: Hubbard ment: à chaque republication, les ouvrages portent dans la plupart des cas une nouvelle date de copyright; exemple, à la date d'aujourd'hui mars 2008, La dernière version de la Dianétique porte les dates "1950, 2007"] Les ouvrages ont été écrits des années avant que l'église soit fondée. [ndt: déformation des faits: c'est la scientologie qui les republie, et c'est à elle qu'ils appartiennent depuis la mort d'Hubbard, en tout cas] LRH n'exerce pas davantage de contrôle sur ses livres que les autres auteurs. [ndt: mensonge: la société d'édition qui les produisait était sa propriété et fonctionnait selon ses ordres] Il n'est pas l'auteur d'aucune des publicités offertes. [mensonge encore: toutes les pubs scientologues -sauf oubli de leur part- portent le copyright, lequel appartenait à Hubbard à l'origine, et appartient depuis sa mort aux bras armés de la scientologie. ndt] Son unique fonction a été d'écrire les ouvrages il y a près d'un quart de siècle. Durant tout ce temps, ces ouvrages n'ont pas été disputés/récusés et ils ont été lus par des flopées et des flopées de gens. [faux à nouveau: dès la sortie de la Dianétique, le 'Livre Un' d'Hubbard, diverses voix - souvent scientifiques - se sont élevées pour en critiquer les théories. Cela n'a jamais cessé ensuite. Quant au nombre de lecteurs, ça n'est jamais un argument de sérieux d'un ouvrage. ndt] C'est tout à fait anticonstitutionnel aux Etats-Unis d'accuser un auteur parce qu'il écrit des livres et ça ne tiendra devant aucun tribunal, qui que ce soit qui vende les livres. [Hubbard sent bien la faiblesse de cet argutie, sinon, il ne parlerait pas de *qui* revend ses ouvrages. D'autre part, la Constitution US ne prévoit pas le cas qu'il annonce, le Premier amendement ne discute que de la liberté de religion et d'expression, et non de la responsabilité que des écrits imposeraient. Exemple: exiger des sommes indues par écrit sous de faux prétextes reste une escroquerie, auteur ou pas, constitution ou non. ndt] Le Premier Amendement garantit la liberté d'expression et de la presse. Par conséquent, son nom doit être retiré de la liste des défenseurs. Si le plaignant n'est pas d'accord, LRH devra alors entamer une procédure judiciaire indépendante à son encontre sur la base de diffamation et calomnie et sur base constitutionnelle, car LRH ne peut être considéré comme partie de ce procès. CIBLE 2 - G2-B Cette personne n'a rien dans les mains si ça arrive devant les juges, pourvu que les audiences soient extrêmement bien préparées et qu'elles ne quittent pas la ligne d'attaque. NOTEZ BIEN: AU DEBUT D'UN CHAPITRE DE LA DIANETIQUE (page 169--?--) on dit que les gens qui ont été esquintés par la psychiatrie ne peuvent être aidés ou sont difficiles à aider. CELA BALAIE LES PLAINTES FRAUDULEUSES CONTRE LRH, puisque le plaignant insiste pour discuter de ce livre dans sa plainte. En outre, il a signé un renoncement. Peut-être plusieurs puisqu'il a passé dans six orgs. Il a été informé que nous ne traitions pas les fous ou les gens ayant été internés et a cependant caché cette donnée (Voir sa White Form). Il est venu sur de fausses bases. Il a refusé une remboursement. [ndt: dans tout le passage suivant, non traduit car très "technique scientologie", Hubbard cherche à ce qu'on donne tort au client/plaignant: il l'accuse d'avoir caché des choses (withholds), d'avoir un indice technique très bas à l'électromètre (Low TA et Mains moites), et Hubbard veut utiliser cela pour enfoncer davantage le plaignant, supposé selon lui réagir en s'effondrant très rapidement si l'on met en doute toutes ses réponses et qu'on répète alors les questions en "restant très calme et agréable" jusqu'au moment où le plaignant "aura l'air coupable pour le jury".] Throughout his processing he had witholds and sweaty hands, most likely, which gives a low tone arm. He is a "low TA" case which means that he is easily directed or misdirected and very easily overwhelmed and will react very badly to badgering or anyone's refusal to accept what he says, which is valuable in face to face interrogation as he will blow up or collapse and willpresent a bad appearance. Carried in the right fashion during cross examination his blow up could be timed (by simple refusal to accept what he says and by asking the same question doubting his answer) to coincide with a point which would look like an admission of guilt and would be interpreted by a judge or jury as such, particularly if the interrogator remains very calm and pleasant: he will give the appearance of mental instability and guilt any time a cross examiner wishes. AO. 1. Il a un long passé de blessures à la tête. Voir 4 juin 73 A, ou (a) "Liste Maux de tête". Voir 2 juin 73 A Piste du Temps, White Form, accident de moto avant la scientologie (1 fevrier 69 WF). Bien qu'il s'en plaigne, on peut être tranquille, dans cette optique judiciaire, que c'est faux. L'org a décidé qu'il n'était pas un client pour elle, elle l'a envoyé consulter semble-t-il le 18 septembre 69, on voit apparaître un Dr Clark et un Dr Scarlet, expliquant qu'il n'y a rien d'anormal à sa tête. (En fait, c'est probablement vrai, en tout cas suffisant pour parier sur un nouvel examen médical qui pourrait également apparaître négatif à ce propos) En fait, il est probablement diabétique, ce qui lui donne ces maux de tête d'origine mystérieuse apparaissant lors de stress, ce qui veut dire que ces maux de tête ont mis des années à se bâtir avec un régime inapproprié, ou des abus d'alcool et de médicaments/drogues. Dans l'optique judiciaire, on peut établir, avec la compétence d'un médecin connaissant la technique médicale contemporaine, que tout va bien pour sa tête. Ils ne penseront pas à faire des tests sanguins ou à des causes secondaires. SES "ENNUIS A LA TETE" existaient AVANT l'audition, on peut l'établir, il a été expédié à un médecin pour manier; on lui a offert de le rembourser et il a refusé et il est revenu dans l'org; et actuellement, il fait semblant que sa tête ne va pas. TOUT CECI DOIT ETRE ETABLI TRES TOT LORS DE TOUT PROCES. AT. 2. Il a des problèmes répétés avec sa femme LOIS et c'est indubitablement elle qui le pousse à porter plainte. Les femmes qui interfèrent dans l'audition des maris veulent vraiment qu'il sorte de là, c'est une veille donnée stable. On peut établir que sa relation avec sa femme était horrible, qu'elle se mêlait sans cesse de sa vie (pas de ses auditions, car il faut éviter ce point pour des raisons postérieures). Attribuez sa perte de revenus à ses ennuis avec son épouse, en expliquant qu'en lui causant un stress permanent, elle l'empèchait de travailler. Qu'en fait, il ne parvenait pas à mettre de l'ordre dans son existence pour pouvoir recevoir de l'audition, et que de fait, il en a fort peu reçu. Mettez le paquet sur sa femme, pour que ce soit elle qui ait l'air d'être une peste l'empêchant de gagner sa vie. AQ. 3. Non seulement il est coupable d'avoir eu d'autres pratiques, mais de contacts à l'intérieur de ces pratiques, au moment où il embêtait les orgs. Voir 2 juin 73 Piste du temps et dossiers à ce sujet. On peut établir par question- naire croisé qu'il était engagé simultanément dans d'autres pratiques pendant qu'il empoisonnait les orgs. Donc, sa condition peut être aussi facilement attribuée à ces autres pratiques qu'à la scientologie. Dale Carnegie, Medecine, hypnose chez le dentiste et enurologie existent, vous pouvez être certains qu'il en existe d'autres. CE POINT DOIT ABSOLUMENT ETRE ETABLI POUR LE crash final ['whamo' en américain] AR. 4. Il a écrit deux lettres de succès ou davantage, où il signale des gains. On peut fouiller et les présenter. on s'en sert pour insister davantage sur sa fausseté. Il dira qu'ils n'ont pas duré. Insinuez que c'est à cause de sa vie irrégulière. AS. 5. Voici maintenant la pièce de résistance qui gagne les points face à l’accusation d’escroquerie. Localisez dans la Dianétique----- le démenti à propos des gens malades mentalement. Localisez le PL qui interdit de traiter les fous ou les gens malades physiquement, localisez les White Form qui omettent son passé psychiatrique. Présentez-les comme pièces concluantes. Déterrez tous ses mensonges antérieurs. Etablissez qu'il était pleinement conscient d'être une victime de la psychiatrie. Etablissez qu'il avait lu la Dianétique DMSM. Etablissez qu'il savait que le sujet l'excluait de son champ et qu'il a falsifié son attestation. Appliquez cela à tout autre plaignant. Etablissez que ça marche en amenant une tonne de lettres de succès. Faites observer que le livre Manuel pour le préclair ne parle que de 88% de réussites. Que l'église n'utilise pas les promesses dianétiques: c'est indiqué sur la décharge. Etablissez qu'il a refusé les remboursements et que le remboursement a été donné à sa femme. Démontrez, c'est facile, qu'il s'est présenté de lui-même dans six églises, qu'on lui a conseillé de redresser le cap dans sa vie avant qu'on puisse l'aider, mais n'admettez pas qu'il était en fait classé sous la règle de "on n'accepte pas les fous". Obtenez la relaxe pour la plainte en escroquerie. Et pour la plainte. AT. 6. Voici la pièce de résistance si la plainte Class Action tient encore. "De la part d'autres gens dans des situations similaires". Cela ne comprendrait donc que les gens qui ont une histoire de folie et qui ont caché ça et ont insisté auprès de l'église pour obtenir des services. Par policy, tous ces gens sont expulsés quand on le découvre. On montre les renonciations qu'ils signent. Si une telle plainte existe, elle est aussi illégale que que celle de Goodrich. Insistez si nécessaire. Obtenez la relaxe pour la partie "Class action" de la plainte. Et pour la plainte. AU. 7. Et voilà le grand final. Si le privilège prètre-pénitent est écarté, la séance du 25 août 69 montre que - ou peut être présentée pour démontrer - que le plaignant AVAIT L'INTENTION DE DETRUIRE L'ORG ET LA SCIENTOLOGIE ET QU'IL N' Y EST RESTE QUE POUR L’ACCOMPLIR pendant trois ans. La personne qui l'a audité peut être appelée pour témoigner. Le rapport peut être exposé comme pièce à conviction. Qu'il a menti au tribunal et à d'autres et que sa femme et ses coplaignants sont impliqués dans une action contre la scientologie et que par cette seule Class Action, il poursuit son but. Une fois cela fait, que sa falsification a été établie par d'autres exemples, ses équivoques seront exposés, tout le dossier de sa fausseté sera inclus dans les pièces à conviction, entre maintenant et le moment futur de son audition, il peut y avoir davantage de menaces de violence ou d'action contre l'église, et ceux-ci peuvent être amenés comme étant incités par Goodrich et ses complices. Qu'il est maladivement voué à la destruction et qu'il est une menace pour la société. Tous les exemples qu'on trouve de ses efforts pour détruire par derrière des bateaux ou des gens doivent être inclus. Tout le procès devrait être démis et la plainte. Et des dommages et des frais accordés aux défenseurs. AV.8. Si la relaxe n'est pas prononcée, introduisez les questions de Premier Amendement comme on l'a planifié dans la stratégie de procès à l'origine. AW.9. Si le plan PREMIER AMENDEMENT échoue, faites appel, car il doit exister une grossière erreur technique si un juge quel qu'il soit ne pronconce pas un non-lieu ou une relaxe à un moment ou un autre. ASSUREZ-VOUS DE NOTER TOUTES LES ERREURS DE CET ORDRE faites par LE TRIBUNAL OU LE PLAIGNANT AU CAS OU IL SERAIT NECESSAIRE DE FAIRE APPEL. AX.10. Recommencez complètement le procès en appel devant le tribunal de l'état. AY.11. Si cela échoue, sur la base du fait que le plaignant rappelle qu'il existe des plaintes contre cinq organisations différentes, dont l'une est dans un autre Etat, sachant qu'il y a déjà eu vice de procédure, qu'il existe des problèmes constitutionnels, ramenez-le à la plus proche des Cours Fédérales de niveau le plus bas. AZ. 12. Si, pour n'importe quelle raison, l'affaire échoue devant ce tribunal, tout en continuant à noter les erreurs techni- ques, emmenez l'affaire devant une Cour fédérale. A cet instant, vous pourriez alors contester la légalité des Class Actions elles-mêmes, car contrairement à d'autres, nous ne pouvons arriver à un règlement amiable, et fort peu ou pas de Class Actions sont allées jusqu'au procès. Cela pourrait donc grimper plus haut encore. (Dans l'entrefaite, on peut espérer que les Class Actions deviennent illégales et que, ce procès ayant démarré par une class action, ça puisse l'annuler complètement. Mais ne comptez pas là-dessus) BA. On doit faire très attention à chaque étape aux questions de parjure. C'est ici la clé. Vous découvrirez que
BB. Dès que vous avez une relaxe, poursuivez pour obtenir non seulement les coûts mais aussi, une vaste vacarme afin d'obtenir un profit en Relations Publiques. Faites quelque chose de saugrenu dès que la relaxe arrive, genre demande extravagante comme
C'est pour le service des Relations Publiques. Le reste de cette cible concerne le service juridique. ____ BC. Revoyez tout le procès pour établir des schémas ou lignes d'attaque révélés par ce procès et agissez afin de les éliminer ensuite. Voir brûler les dossiers à Saint Hill à la fin des années 60 [importante organisation fondée par Hubbard dans les années 50 en Angleterre, ndt]
BD. Développez et inventez de nouveaux blocages ou annulateurs ou invalidateurs face à de telles lignes d'attaque.
BE. ATTENTION LORS DES PROCES. Ne laissez pas les plaignants perturber votre ligne d'attaque. Maniez leurs efforts et arrangez-vous toujours pour que la dernière étape vous revienne. BF. Ne montrez pas un mot de ce plan à qui que ce soit, ni de données liées à la stratégie d'attaque jusqu'au procès proprement dit, s'il avait lieu. FIN D' EVALUATION. 8 June 75 Evaluation Goodrich (Addition 1) Page 5. PP. Ajout 1B: ainsi que déjà mentionné dans la stratégie, rendez le procès aussi coûteux que possible pour eux. Mais pour ça, évitez les frais excessifs pour nous afin de ne pas absorber des fonds inutilement ou risquer de ruiner d'autres actions ailleurs. L'une des méthodes pour rendre leurs dépenses fort coûteuses est utilisée ailleurs et pourrait être transposée aux USA: on remet sans cesse en cause la compétence financière et la responsabilité financière du plaignant, en expliquant qu'il n'a pas de quoi, qu'il change toujours de job, ou qu'il a de grosses dettes, ce qui ferait qu'il serait incapable de payer ensuite les dommages et les frais: ça conduit à faire examiner ses finances pour le procès, puis en dehors, et on peut ainsi faire traîner, demande après demande, exiger des exceptions pour demander d'autres dépositions, qui entraîneront davantage de coûts etc. Le plaignant est celui qui cause des problèmes mais n'en est PAS DU TOUT responsable. On peut alors remonter à la source des des financements. On obtient des changements de juridictions au moindre prétexte ce qui augmente la charge financière. Chaque fois, on remet en cause l'irresponsabilité juridique du plaignant, sa folie, ses droits légitimes, et on répète toutes les raisons pour lesquelles l'église lui a refusé ses services. Cherchez d'autres moyens d'augmenter ses frais. Et dans l'un ou plusieurs d'entre eux, trouvez un usage incorrect des finances, ou une quelconque malfaisance des plaignants ou de Lazare pour obtenir des fonds des autres plaignants. Transformez-le si possible en un procès pénal sur le plan financier.
PQ. Ajout 1C. Intell (Bureau Information) afin d'obtenir de l'information légale sur la manière dont les fonds parviennent et pour découvrir la preuve que le procès est en réalité un moyen de faire payer les autres plaignants, -- une sorte de fraude organisée par le plaignant et son avocat.
PR. Ajout 1D. Il se peut que Lois et Lazarus se débarrassent de Goodrich. Le couple peut avoir quelque chose en tête et préparer quelque chose à son propos pour prouver qu'on lui a fait du tort. Il y a quelque chose d'incorrect là-dedans. Trouvez quoi. Judiciairement.
Cible 6 et ses données suggérées. REVISION (aux Pages 6 & 9B) Si, selon opinion d'avocat, ceci risquait de trop coincer LRH dans le procès, ne vous en servez que si le plaignant en parle, sinon, obtenez qu'on écarte LRH du fait que ce serait seulement à cause des livres qu'il est nommé comme l'un des défenseurs. Si le plaignant amène ça sur le tapis, on peut alors tenter de faire ôter LRH. Ce document existe en copie d'original au format pdf en anglais: http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/goodrich-eval.pdf (969 KB) ICI: Traduction de Roger Gonnet au format pdf (322 KB) |
|
Cette "Evaluation" Goodrich très secrète est l'oeuvre de Hubbard. Voici ce qu'en dit un ancien scientologue (textes anglais) Source:
Mike McClaughry interview, 2/05/2000 Transcribed by Batchild (Sue M.) Converted to HTML by Batchild (Sue M.) MIKE McCLAUGHRY: My name is Mike McClaughry. I'm a Scientologist. I got into Scientology in late 1968, and in early 1969 I went on staff at the San Francisco org. Um, the first three or four years I was on staff, I was an auditor and a Course Supervisor, basically Course Supervisor for the Academy Levels and every other course that Scientology delivered at that time. Um, I liked the tech then and I still like it today. And in mid 1973, I was approached to join the Guardian's Office at the San Francisco org. And at the time I did not want to get out of tech, and I declined their offer and said basically "No, I'm not interested", you know, "I want to stay working with the tech." So they re-approached me again a few weeks later--um, by the way, Kathy O'Gorman was the Assistant Guardian at the San Francisco org at the time; she was to become my senior. Uh, Doug Nopston was the Assistant Guardian for Information, which is a euphemism for Intelligence, and he was the one that was trying to recruit me. Um, anyway, I was approached a couple of weeks later again to join the Guardian's Office, and they made me an offer which was that I would get to go--I was at the time a Power Release, which is a Grade 5, and they made me an offer that I could go up to OT4 if I would join the Guardian's Office and so I bit on that and I said, "Okay", and I joined the Guardian's Office so that I could get some auditing. Um, so I went down--I guess it was mid summer of '73--I went down to take my, uh, training at the United States Guardian's Office, which was in Los Angeles, and the person who was, um, the Deputy Guardian Intelligence United States, uh, at that time was Terry Milner. Um, Dick Weigand was, uh, one of his juniors; I'm not sure what post he was holding at the time. And Greg, uh, I don't remember his last name off the top of my head--Willardson--Greg Willardson was also working with him. And they were over the, uh, course students, overseeing the training of the course students. It took me six months to finish my hatting in the Guardian's Office. Um, I read all the various materials that, um, for the Intelligence Bureau, that you might see on the Internet or appearing in court cases or Hat Packs since then, and I would have personal knowledge that the issues in those Hat Packs are correct and were the ones that were studied and were the ones that we used and applied in our daily work. Um, I'll talk about some of those in detail and give you some examples of what I did to apply those issues. Um, my understanding was that the issues were primarily from LRH. Some of the issues, um, had nobody's name on it but just by the way they were written, I assumed they were from LRH. Um, some of 'em were from Mary Sue Hubbard; some of them might have been from the Guardian who was Jane Kember, um, but some of them didn't have Jane Kember's name or Mary Sue Hubbard's name on them, um, and I think that LRH wrote them. WRITTEN BY LRH MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Um, the two specific ones that I'm talking about, they weren't under any kind of a normal issue like a Policy Letter or a Guardian Order or ED or anything, right? It was just typing on a piece of paper. Um, one was called "Intelligence: Its Role" and the other one was--I don't even know that it had a name; but it told us how to do, um, black intelligence operations, this particular piece of paper. And, like I said, there was no author of those two things; although my understanding, impression and so forth was that they were written by LRH, because of the style of them. You know, I've read a lot of his stuff, I know how he talks, I know how he writes, and I couldn't imagine anybody else to have written them except him because of the style of the--of how they were written INTEL'S ROLE MIKE McCLAUGHRY: The basic idea was that Intelligence was supposed to collect information and form what was called an estimate of the situation. An estimate of the situation was not something that was cast in stone or something that you could necessarily prove in court, but based on as much information about the enemy as you could ascertain. Um, you were supposed to be able to determine whether there was a situation with the enemy that needed to be handled or whether there was no situation, and basically you were supposed to be able to form a prediction, uh, like in any war situation, you know; you infiltrate the enemy, uh, you determine his size, his strength, what his next move is gonna be, if he's gonna make one, you know, uh, that kind of a thing. And the whole idea of the estimate of the situation, which was a primary product of the Intelligence Unit, was to make a prediction: What's the enemy going to do, when, where, what strength and so on and so forth, right? And having made that prediction, then Intelligence was supposed to handle the situation before it ever happened. And any time an attack came on the organization that was unpredicted, it was considered to be an Intelligence failure. All somebody had to do was criticize Scientology and they would be considered an enemy. For instance, if they wrote a book that was negative on it in any form, if they got on a TV show or radio show--you didn't even have to go that far; if they were just talking to their neighbors and we heard of it! (laughter) G.O. BUREAUS MIKE McCLAUGHRY: If an attack happens that Intelligence didn't predict, we didn't--we weren't out of the ball game, that didn't mean that, you know. Um, we kind of judged the severity of the attack and how bad it was by the different bureaus. The bureaus were laid out in a sequence. If Intelligence failed and, and an attack occurred, and Intelligence wasn't handling it, uh, then it went over to PR. Uh, PR--then we tried to PR our way out of the attack. Uh, if PR failed, then the next thing it would go over to, the next bureau, was the Legal Bureau and you tried to sue your way out of the attack. And if that failed, the last bureau was Finance and you'd buy your way out of the attack! (laughter). The datum is that Intelligence is supposed to predict and handle all attacks. Uh, even if it wasn't predicted, Intelligence was supposed to handle it. No other bureau was supposed to be on, doing a damn thing, okay? If Intelligence is doing its job. They should all be sitting around with their feet on their desks with nothing to do, okay? Intelligence is supposed to handle it all, all by itself. Um, when Intelligence was having difficulty with a particular attacker and they weren't getting the person handled, then other bureaus would enter the picture and they'd try to PR their way out of it, sue their way out of it or buy their way out of it. But, uh, that was all considered to be an Intelligence failure. "THE SPY & HIS MASTERS" MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Intelligence also had internal security to deal with. Part of our training was a book called "The Spy & His Masters". This book taught you how to be a Case Officer. That's what--that's the "master" part of the title, "The Spy & His Masters" and the Case Officer is the master of the spy. Um, this--the technique used would be to determine the spy's motivation. Um, money was considered to be the lowest motivation. You don't wanna recruit spies who, uh, are money-motivated because they'll turn on you in a second; if the other side offers them another 10 bucks more, they're on their side! (laughter) So, uh, you try and avoid--you would have to determine what is this person's motivation as being a spy for us, try to avoid people doing it for money, try to avoid people--the next one up was people who, uh, were maybe ambit--you know, they had some ambition to get promoted within the organization, something like that, was why they were doing it for you; try to avoid those as well. Um, I think the next one up was, uh, people who had some political reason for doing it. Um, (clears throat) you know, in our case we weren't in the politics, but what that meant to me was like they had some kind of allegiance to the organization, uh, they agreed with what you were doing and that kind of a thing. The top motivation was duty; the person was doing it out of a sense of responsibility. And those were the kind of spies we tried to recruit because they were the safest, um, most unlikely to turn, uh, that, that kind of a thing. Uh, when I say "spy", I'm talking about somebody who lives their cover. I'm not talking about somebody who does a 10 minute, um--well, we called them "suitable guises"; there's other words for 'em like "pretext interviews", that kind of thing. A pretext interview or a suitable guise would be something that was a short-lived, um, you know, you got throwaway type cover for a temporary situation. Um--geez, I can hardly think of one. Uh, let's say I just wanted to know your telephone number, okay? And so I call up--I don't, I don't know your telephone number or maybe I can't find you, I don't know where you live. But I know where your mother lives, okay? So I call up your mother and say I'm your friend and I'm looking for you, can you tell me your phone number, and I get it, okay? That's a--that's a suitable guise or a pretext interview, okay? That's a throwaway thing, you know, you just use it once, it's--it's there for a few minutes and it's gone, you know. Uh, you got the information you wanted. Those were commonly used, but I'm not talk--when I say "spy", I don't mean that. I mean somebody who is just like in the normal intelligence community, um, the government's--their kind of spies that they use on each other. These--you know, those people live their cover. They have false identities in a lot of cases, and we did know how to make false identities for people. FALSE IDENTITIES MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You basically go out and you look for an infant death in the newspaper around the age period of the person who's gonna be the spy, okay? Um, an infant death, you know, there's a birth certificate on record there, but there's nobody who ever lived that life. So you get their birth certificate and you go out and you get yourself a driver's license, uh, a Social Security card and every other kind of ID you want, and assume that person's name. That's how you do it-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: How do you get a birth certificate? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Well, back then--you know, I think laws have changed a little bit. Back then, I mean, you just walk in; it's public record, you know? I want a copy of it, they didn't ask any questions. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You know, give you a copy of it and down you go to the DMV with it--"This is me, give me a driver's license" and do the whole bit, right? You build a whole false identity (laughs), and there you go. So that's how that was done. That--that would be a deep cover type of spy. Now, this person is--when I say they're living this false identity, uh, that's what I mean. They're going by this false name, they have false--you know, everything's false. One of the nice things about that is this person could do every kind of thing you ever heard of and never get blamed for it as his real identity, you know what I'm saying? (laughs) Um, it just wouldn't track back to him. Um, we didn't do a lot of that. Mostly people would use their own real names, but they were still deep cover spies because they were living their cover every day. Um, in some--a lot of cases they had false names, uh, without going through the process of actually, you know, building a total false identity for 'em. They would just--say that we sent 'em in to infiltrate the anti-cult movement, for instance, which is something I specifically did. Um, what I did was I took a Scientologist--we wanted to infiltrate the anti-cult movement. Um, I expelled this Scientologist so on paper it looked like they were expelled, you know. We wrote out the Ethics Orders, the whole bit, um, false Comm Ev, everything like that, and then this person was kicked out of the church. Um, in everybody's mind in the church this person was expelled Scientologist. Uh, the only people who knew that they weren't was, you know, the guys in the Intelligence Bureau. And that's a deep cover spy. So this person would go out and, uh, they were using their actual name, uh, but their cover was, it was that they were, uh, no longer in Scientology, no longer agreed with it, agreed with the anti-cult people, you know, and wanted to do--you know, they were mad at Scientology, they wanted to help the anti-cult movement expose it and stuff like that. And then, so of course they were opened with welcome arms by the anti-cult people and now here we go and now there's my deep cover spy in the anti-cult movement. So predict, predict, predict--"Oh, they're gonna deprogram so-and-so tomorrow. Oh, I see." See what I mean? This group right here is a target for getting a spy, and they ain't gonna sleep at night till they do it! (laughs) UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: I'm afraid that's true. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Okay. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Hope it's not you. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Well, I'll tell you something about that that will help you find out who it might be. Because Intelligence is also charged with finding spies in the organization. Now that person I'm talking about that I sent in on the anti-cult movement--there is a limit to what I would let that person do. Okay? You know, they could criticize, they could help, they could complain, they could natter all they wanted to about Scientology; I really didn't care. But I would not let 'em go to a newspaper and say it. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: I would not let 'em testify in a court case against Scientology. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: That's going too damn far, you're causing more destruction than you're worth! (laughs) Okay, you know what I'm saying? UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Um-hmm. (laughs) UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: You'd test the person. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: That's what I'm telling you. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: What I'm doing right here--no way, Jose, you ain't making no tape like that! You know what I'm saying? (laughter) The Case Officer is gonna put us--you know, no, you ain't doing that. Okay. (laughs) UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Right. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: So (laughs) that's one way to tell. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Yeah. ANTI-CULT MOVEMENT MIKE McCLAUGHRY: In the case of this spy that I had in the anti-cult movement, um, we were predicting attacks all over the country with that person. Um, I think maybe I was the only one who had successfully infiltrated the anti-cult movement because of what my seniors at USGO were saying. They were always calling me going, "Who's getting deprogrammed next?" and I was "Well, isn't there anybody else out there working besides me? Don't you have any other spies out there (laughs) to tell you?" Because they wanted to know what was happening in New York and Florida and everywhere else, right? And asking me. And I was up in San Francisco. We predicted deprogrammings in other, uh, considered cults--Moonie deprogrammings, you name it, you know. We predicted those as well and prevented a lot of them from happening. We considered them allies, you know, and so if a Moonie was gonna be deprogrammed, um, we would predict that and we would, uh, let them know and they would go hide the person or whatever they had to do, you know, to stop that from happening. That happened because of our spies. Um, mostly, I mean our primary interest, of course, was Scientologists. We predicted those and prevented those from happening. I did read one of the policies where it said we weren't supposed to do anything illegal. Um, I became aware in the course of my training that, um, things were being done that were illegal. Uh, I went to the Deputy Guardian for Intelligence US--um, by the way, we didn't call it the Information Bureau, we called it Intelligence, what it was. Calling it the Information Bureau was the, the only time we referred to it that way was when we were talking to somebody who wasn't in the GO. And that was kind of our cover, you know, that we were Information; we never told them we were Intelligence. But amongst ourselves, we didn't call ourselves Information; we were Intelligence. Um, so anyway, I read, you know, "Don't do anything illegal". Um, I went to the Deputy Guardian at Intelligence US who was Terry Milner. I said, uh, "Some people aren't following this policy. They're doing things that are illegal." And, uh, he knew about it; that's what I found out. He says, "Yeah, I know about that." (laughs) And I says, "Well, they're violating policy", you know, "What's the story here?", you know, "Do we break the law?" And, uh (laughs)--and he says, "Well, we don't actually break the law, we just bend it a little bit!" (laughs) And he says, you know--he drew a line on his desk--this guy was kind of a crazy guy, anyway, and, uh, (laughs). UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: He was crazy. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: And he says, "There's the law," you know, and he says, "We kind of cross over that line and then we, for a little bit, and then we scurry back and try to get back and stay within the law." And so, well, the conclusion I came to was: 1) he knew about it; 2) he was condoning it. And I, out of fear, did not take it any higher than that; I just dropped it. Because I figured if he knew about it, then Worldwide knew about it and I figured Mary Sue knew about it, and I couldn't imagine her withholding anything from Ron; I figured he must know about it, too. So if I make any waves uplines about it to try to, um, get that activity stopped, uh, you know, then I would be dog meat, you know, so I just dropped it. (laughs) As far as Intelligence Bureau's handling of people, there's an issue--um, I don't think it has a title, uh, nobody signed it, it's not any kind of a formal issue; it's just typing on a piece of paper. Um, my impression was that LRH had written it because I can't imagine anybody else in the organization writing this and getting away with it; they would have been pounded, you know, to dirt for having written it! (laughter) And, you know, unless it was him. That's the way I looked at it, plus the way it was written and just like "Intel: Its Role", it seemed to me that was his writing style. But he--you know, basically, what this issue said was the way that the Intelligence Bureau handles things, um, was that you perform something that I'll say, what I call 'em is a Black Intelligence operation, and I'm not the only one who called 'em that; they're called Black Ops. WHAT ARE YOUR CRIMES? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: One of the datums that we were taught is that anybody that attacks Scientology has crimes. Um, you know, that doesn't just mean crimes against Scientology; it means crimes in general in the normal society definition and idea of what a crime is. Uh, we were supposed to investigate the background of anybody who attacked and find out what their crimes were. Um, and then prosecute them for it; that was the basic idea. Um, if we couldn't--and the first thing that would have happened with anybody who attacked us--there's two types of data collection; one is called "overt data collection", which we call ODC. Uh, the other type of data collection to be done was "covert data collection" which was called CDC. Um, we did both on any given attacker. We always did ODCs on them and we always did CDCs on them. Um, the overt data collection was just stuff that was publicly available through public records--telephone books, library information, court documents, traffic tickets, you name it, you know. We checked every possible source--voter registration records, you know, just everything you could think of, um, and gathered as much information about that person's background as we could obtain. Um, then we had a general picture of the person. We knew who his relatives were and who he was connected to, where he worked, all that kind of stuff. That came from overt data collection. Then we go into covert data collection, which was essentially, um, you know, probably getting a spy in on the person and trying to find out what kind of, um, misdeeds the guy was up to, you know. Um, what are this guy's crimes? You know, what is doing? Is he cheating on his wife? Is he, uh, you know, taking drugs? Is he doing anything else that broke any kind of a law whatsoever? You know, that's what we were looking for in our covert data collection. Um, if we found crimes, we tried to get the person prosecuted and put in jail. That was the product that we wanted, that was the ideal scene, get this guy behind bars, you know, for criticizing Scientology (laughs), basically. Um, (laughs) that's where you wanted 'em; you wanted 'em in jail. That was the, uh, ideal product to be obtained. Now, a lot of times we could not find, uh, this person committing crimes to put 'em in jail for, maybe because he didn't have any and maybe because we just couldn't find them; either way. Um, and I believe in a lot of case it was just because the guy didn't really have any; the datum wasn't true, that just because they attacked, they had crimes. I didn't find that to be a one-for-one situation anyway. So now, what do you do, you can't find any actual crimes, so that's what this particular hatting thing was about was you perform Black Operations on the person. Um, the first, uh, type of Black Operation would be to, uh,--okay, if the guy doesn't have any actual crimes, well, let's make him guilty of some crime then! (laughs) UNIDENTIFIED MAN: You manufacture some. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You manufacture some crimes, right? Set 'em up, sting operation type stuff. Um, oh, I know some that were actually done, I don't have to give examples. Um, there was a guy in Sacramento named Jim Esterbrook, um, I got one of my agents to go get some, um, drugs, you know, purchase some illegal drugs, marijuana or whatever it was, plant 'em in the guy's car and then call the cops on him and try to get him arrested for possession of illegal drugs. Um, geez, just let your imagine run wild because, uh, we were allowed to do that, you know. It's like anything you could think of was basically okay. FAIR GAME MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Fair Game was a policy letter written by LRH, I guess in the mid '60, I think. Um, and it was a fundamental GO policy. Um, Fair Game meant that a Scientologist could do anything to an enemy of Scientology, um, didn't matter what it was. You could actually physically harm the person. You could lie to them, ch--sue 'em to poverty, uh, you know, uh, destroy the person's reputation or physical--destroy them physically if you wanted to, with no repercussion on the Scientologist for having done it. That's what Fair Game means. Um, yeah, I mean, that's what--that's what we were doing; that was our daily job, was to apply that policy. That was our total job, if you ask me. You're attacking Scientology, you're Fair Game, you know, whatever we do to you doesn't really matter, okay? As far as Scientology was concerned, you were no trouble. I don't know the details on it, but, uh, it was causing a public relations flap when people were labeled Fair Game. So the issue came out that said, "Stop labeling people Fair Game." Which was done--okay, we stopped calling people Fair Game. But the action of treating 'em like Fair Game never stopped, okay? We, they could--that policy was still in effect. I mean, my God, it was the very heart and soul of what we were doing, okay? We would have been out of a job if we stopped doing Fair Game! (laughter) GET THE GUY FIRED MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Another type of Black Operation was to get the guy fired from his job. The theory on that was, is that people use their job, their position, uh, what they have to have at work is a kind of a position to attack Scientology from. Um, in a lot of cases that was true; maybe the guy was a government official, he was using his, uh, job as a government official to attack Scientology. So the idea was, let's cost him his job, get him the heck out of there and then he won't have that position to attack Scientology from any more. Short of that, it didn't have to be that he was using his job to attack Scientology from; but in all cases it was at least his support, right? And if you cost him his job, he doesn't have money and he's got a major problem to deal with in his life in not having any work and income to support himself. So costing the guy his job was always a good thing to do. That was also a standard thing to do, was we would always try to cost the guy his job. We would always try to get him in jail and we would always try to cost him his job. Lots of people's businesses have been destroyed because of this. Um-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: How did you do it ? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Huh? UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: How did you destroy their business ? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Oh, gosh, you know, there's lots of ways, um, you know, this is not a real example, but let's say that a guy is emplo--has his own, um, work, right? He has his own company. He of course has clients, right? That buy from him and that kind of a thing. Uh, let's say that the guy is, um, he makes--he's an artist and he paints pictures and he's got certain art studios that normally buy his pictures and sell 'em for him. They would go to those art studios and, um, just badmouth the guy in any kind of a way, and make the people who buy from him normally decide that they don't, for whatever reason they have, they don't like him and they're not gonna buy from him any more, and he ends up with no business, you know, he goes broke. That would be an example. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Uh-huh. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Um, basically, to cost the guy the job--now, I'm getting back to this issue I'm talking about that teaches you how to do this, this is what it said, right? You fi--you, um, survey the love and the hate buttons of the boss. So this guy has a boss, he's employed by this person, this company. What are--what does the boss love and what does the boss hate? You were supposed to find that out with your spy. Or you could have found that out with a pretext interview, you know, a suitable guise. (clears throat) Then you, uh, create situations which are always imaginary situations where the boss--you try to line this employee up with whatever the boss hates, okay? So if the guy--uh, you find out the boss hates homosexuals, now you want to get the boss to think that this guy who is attacking Scientology is a homosexual, you know. And because he is a homosexual, now the boss not liking that type of person he's gonna look for some way to get rid of this guy. He'll probably find some--you know, you can't say that's the reason he's getting rid of 'em but that's the reason he's getting rid of 'em, you know. He'll find some fault with this guy's work and get rid of 'em. Part 2 MIKE McCLAUGHRY: When I first went on post in early 1974 there was a case called Goodrich. I think his name was Robert Goodrich, Lois--Robert and Lois Goodrich. Uh, this guy was claiming that, uh, he had gotten auditing and, uh, it gave him a headache which wouldn't go away.(laughter) UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Oh, no. (more laughter) MIKE McCLAUGHRY: So Ron had written Eval and the guys who were on post for me in San Francisco Intelligence Bureau were not handling it, and the guys at USGO weren't handling it, and Ron was getting kind of upset about all that. So (laughs) So he wrote that Eval, you guys are missing the boat, you don't understand the importance of this. This has got to get handled. I don't know that he wrote any steps out, you know, of what to do; I never saw that. Um, I just know that he wanted it handled. I went on post immediately and that was one of the first things that we did handle, um, and that was a rather simple handling as it turned out because I got a spy in on them. Um, you know, they were there for maybe two months, something like that. Um, the person basically became friends with the wife, Lois Goodrich, and talked her out of doing it. That's all that happened (laughs), you know it's, yeah, said-- UNIDENTIFIED MAN: --say so. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Yeah. Just basically, uh, you know, said, "You know, you really ought to just drop that case with Scientology because, you know, you're not gonna win, it's not gonna be worth it, you know, it's gonna be a lot of headaches" and da-da-da. And because they had become friends, she said, "You know, you're probably right" and dropped that stupid thing. That's how that thing got handled. JIM ESTERBROOK MIKE McCLAUGHRY: I'll give you an example of using the love-hate button, okay? This is an actual operation that I did. Um, there was a guy in the Health Department in Sacramento by the name of Jim Esterbrook. Um, he was attacking Narconon. The reason he was attacking Narconon, uh, which we didn't know at the time, was that he had plans for starting his own drug rehabilitation group in Sacramento, California. Um, he was, uh, an official in the Health Department in Sacramento, State Health Department, okay? And he was using that position to attack Narconon from. He wrote a, a very criticizing report, you know, about that thick (holds his right thumb and index finger about one inch apart) on the subject of Narconon. We found out that, uh, through the spy that Jim Esterbrook had plans on starting a new drug program which he was going to--he was applying to the state for. He was asking for the state funding for his new drug program which he was gonna hold up in the mountains. One day, um, me and my right-hand man, uh, took a drive up into the mountain community where this was gonna happen. (laughs) Okay? We picked up a couple of teenage girls that were hitch-hiking on the road, uh, we went swimming in the river with them that day, um, just got into communication with these two teenage girls. And while we were driving them up to--uh, after we went swimming we were driving them up to where they lived. And I said, "By the way, what do people don't like up here?" Right? I'm working the hate button, see? (laughs) And they say, "Well, we hate hippies." Right? (laughs) So, I go, "Okay, you guys hate hippies" and in fact she tells me this story. She says, "I'll show you how bad we hate hippies. There's a guy up here who owns two houses. He lives in one, the other one's vacant. Some hippies moved into it and he came over with gas cans, poured it on his own house and burned his own house down!" (laughter) "That's how much we hate hippies!" (laughter) So I go back down to Sacramento and recruit about six to eight Scientologists. I said--these are all guys--and I say, "You don't take a bath for a week, you don't shave for a week" and at the end of that week--they did that, right? Um, (laughs) we dress 'em up like hippies, we go up there. I got a radio, um, they have a radio. I have 'em wait outside of town, they're in some hippie-looking dumb-ass van, right? (laughter) You get the picture already, don't you? So he leaves, finally, he goes down in Sacramento, wherever he's going, he's gonna be gone for an hour or something. And I said, and I radio back to the hippies in the van, "Okay, come into town, he's gone." They come into town, they pretend like they're friends of this guy, right? The PR guy, like they know him. "Hey, where's Mike So-and-so? We're his good buds!" Right? And, and, um, by God, we ARC-broke everybody in that town badly, okay? (laughs) It's like the stuff they did, they did everything they could possibly do that was untactful, to insult people to, um, you know, they would--they would, like, go into some shop where some little old lady's in there with her values, and they would go, "You got any stuff we could roll our weed with?" You know, kick the dog, grab the girls' asses, you know, everything you could think of, right? (laughter) UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Oh, my God. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Insulting people and all under the--under the, uh, making them think that they were friends with this guy. They knew about the drug program, they were gonna be part of this new drug program, and "isn't that gonna be wonderful when we have this drug program up here because all of these people like us are gonna come, and we're gonna be smoking dope and getting your kids to smoke dope and" (laughter) it's gonna be a great time, right? Well, that went on for about 10-15 minutes and that town was terrorized when they left, you know? Um, and in a small town like that, I mean, anything that happens, you know, if a dog barks or something it hits the paper. I mean, this was a major catastrophe, (laughs) you know, for these people. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Yeah. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: So, uh, they said, "There ain't no way in hell we're having a drug program up here!" (laughter) UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: And all this guy did was go down to Sacramento for an hour. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Well, he got back!-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: --gone. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: He came back in an hour and this town was up in arms, man, they were gonna lynch this sucker, right? (laughs) So anyway, uh, we got--we let it go for a week. I recruited another agent who was a girl, I sent her up there to go sit in the bar. And they're still talking about this, all those damn hippies, you know, "No, no, they're not coming up here!", right? (laughs) A week later (laughs) UNIDENTIFIED MAN: --right. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: So she says to them--which, you know, I told her to say to them--"Why don't you guys circulate a petition up here and send it to your congressman?" Okay? "And tell 'em you don't want no drug program up here." Which they did, right there on the spot, that's a good idea! (laughs) UNIDENTIFIED MAN: --doing their civic duty. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Yeah--"here it is, let's make a petition right now!" They did it, they all signed it, they sent it to the congressman, the congressman got wind of it and, uh, in fact they phone-called and, you know, they just raised a big stink. And it killed the whole drug program. They called up Esterbrook and said, "You ain't getting no money for no drug programs!" (laughs) UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Wow. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: (laughs) That wasn't the only operation we did on him. By the time I was done with him, the guy sold his house and got the hell out of the state to get away from me. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Did he know it was you? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Me? Oh, yeah. He didn't know it was me; he knew Scientology did this to him but nobody listened to him. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Right. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You know, he said, "Those damn Scientologists!" and they thought he was nuts! See what I mean? (laughs) LSD MIKE McCLAUGHRY: This wasn't one that I did, but my juniors participated in, I just happened to be out of town at the time. A, uh, psychiatrist from Mexico was coming up. I don't know the guy's name--I think it started with an M or something like that. But he was coming up to San Francisco and he was gonna give a speech to other psychiatrists at the, uh, Hilton Hotel there, which is just right around the corner from the org. Um, they had a, some kind of convention. He was their main speaker. And the operation was--and a guy flew up from USGO who was gonna do it, his name was Gary Lawrence. He wasn't very good at Black Ops. I mean, he wasn't as creative as my mind, you know. These were the kinds of things he thought of; mine were a little more incisive and--you know what I mean? UNIDENTIFIED MAN: And effective. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: And effective as well, like Ida Camburn's and that kind of thing, you know. But his, uh--he couldn't think of, um, ops like that to do to people so he thought of things like LSD in the toothpaste (laughs), you know. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: He's flamboyant. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Yeah (laughs). So, uh--and maybe that's the problem today. Maybe these guys down there aren't that bright so they end up with things like the Minutemen and stuff like that, you know, "This is what we'll do, we'll have a hit-and-run accident, you know, that's a good idea" you know. They went and got some LSD. The solution to this guy's giving a speech was they're gonna put LSD in his toothpaste. Um, so therefore, when he got up to give his speech, you know, he would go on a drug trip and everybody would think he was crazy. That was their plan. Um, they got into his room and, um, I got back from my mission and I heard about this and I went, "You guys are crazy!", you know (laughs). Because it wasn't that part, my junior was totally freaked out, you know. He was just having a moral cow (laughs) over this thing, right? And the reason was, it wasn't so much the guy and putting tooth--you know, LSD in the guy's toothpaste. It was the fact that the guy's wife was with him, and she was pregnant. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Yes. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: And they put it in her toothpaste, too. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Yes. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You know. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Oh, my God! UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Yeah, that was horrible. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: So what happened? ANOTHER UNIDENTIFIED MAN: --Sea Org. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Hmm? UNIDENTIFIED MAN: What happened. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: I didn't even want to hear. I said, "I don't even want to hear what happened! You guys are crazy!", you know? (laughs) And my junior was in a state to be tied, you know. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Because of--because he had done it? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: He participated in it to some degree. I don't think he actually, um--I don't know because I wasn't there, you know. His name was Paul Elkins. Part 3 SNOW WHITE MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Uh, things I did on the Snow White program, that was to get all government files on the subject of Scientology so that PR could go in and, uh, do false report corrections on those files. Uh, the methods used to obtain files--I know one of my juniors got a suitable guise that he had made where he was able to obtain some government files legally, because a suitable guise is legal; it's their problem if they give it to you, right? He got some Justice Department files with a suitable guise that he was doing an anti-Scientology movie. And some people did turn over their files to him. Um, however, not everybody fell for that particular suitable guise and a lot of government agencies says, uh, "Well, get out of here with your movie, we're not--we're not interested!" (laughs), you know, when they--so they didn't give 'em their files. Um, one of the people who, uh, wouldn't turn over their files was the Yolo County District Attorney's office, uh, the Justice Department, um, in the Attorney General's office in Sacramento, uh, CI&I files--that's Criminal Intelligence & Investigation, um, people like that, you know. They just wouldn't let--give, turn over their files. So we had to resort to some other methods to obtain those files. Uh, in the case of the Yolo County DA--uh, his name was Roger Brown--at the time, the way we got into his files was, um, at night--well, actually, I, I took my right-hand man with me, uh, had him go inside the office while they were still open, go into the ladies' bathroom and, um, hide in there. So everybody left that day at 5, as usual, locked up their doors and windows and so forth, um, but my guy was in the bathroom. So, um, after we knew they were all gone, he opened the lady--the back window to the ladies' bathroom. I crawled through. Um, we had lock picks, we got into their locked file cabinets, got out the Scientology files and copied them all on their copier-- UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Wow-- MIKE McCLAUGHRY: --and, uh, crawled out the window and left! (laughs) That was how we got those files. Um, in the case of the, uh, the, um, Attorney General's office for the state of California, uh, that was--we just went in there, uh, after hours. Uh, we got in, um--I think that was another case that we, that we just hid in the building until everybody left. Uh, the janitors came in, that made it kind of an exciting moment; um, we were trying to hide from the janitors! (laughter) UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Oh, my God! MIKE McCLAUGHRY: But that was another case of lock picks, was how we got 'em. Um, you know, got into their file cabinets and copied their files. Um, I did another one where they sent me to get the files of the World Federation for Mental Health. Um, the headquarters for the World Federation of Mental Health was in the Caribbean at the time, um, I think it was Grenada or some--one of those countries down there. Um, I was sent down there under the instructions that I was to obtain those files and do not come back without them, you know. And I thought that that meant that I would be expelled if I did come back without them. They said, "Use whatever means you have to. We don't care if you have to break and enter, we don't care if you have to use a sledgehammer. Uh, whatever you gotta do, bring those files back here." Well, we always tried suitable guises first, you know. We only resorted to, um, breaking and entering if those didn't work. I had another missionnaire with me who had a suitable guise of being a Time magazine reporter. We had built a complete identity for him that, uh, he was in fact a Time magazine reporter. So we go down there; I was the back-up and I was to do the B & E or whatever it took to get 'em if he failed to get 'em. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: B & E? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Breaking and entering, illegal method of entering a building (laughs). Um, so we went down to the Caribbean. Um, he used a suitable guise on, uh, whoever was there--I was not with him; I was waiting outside. Um, the place was incredibly fortified, um--guards walking around, armed guards with police dogs and that kind of a thing (laughs). And I'm going, "Yeah, and I gotta come back with these or else, right?" (laughs) UNIDENTIFIED MAN: -- what you're supposed to do. (still laughing) UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Then what did you do? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Um, as it turned out, um, he goes in with a suitable guise. Uh, he finds out that they are just in the process of moving the headquarters from there to Canada, and that the files weren't there. And so he told me that and I went, "Oh, wow, I'm glad they're not here!" (laughter) I guess you don't need in some foreign country, right? In jail. Or some dog gnawing my ankle off, you know, trying to get those files! (laughs) So, uh, so we reported that back and said they've moved the headquarters, uh, to Canada; the files are up there. They said, "Okay, you're on your way to Canada", which we did. We went to Canada, um, it was Christmastime and nobody was there. There was nobody to do a suitable guise on; everybody was on Christmas vacation. It was a hospital, a mental hospital. Um, so we tried to talk the receptionist of the building into letting us into the, um, the office where the World Federation for Mental Health headquarters was. Um, and we actually succeeded at that. The plan that we devised was that, um, we were going to leave a Christmas present for the, um, president of the Federation. Um, since he wasn't available, uh, for us to hand-deliver it, um, we said, "Can you let us in his office? We'll put the present on his table and then we'll leave." Okay, well, she agreed to that. Um, we--my partner went in and he put the present on the table. While she's going in and letting him do that, I got a piece of tape behind me, right? And I tape the door, you know, so that when you shut the door the, the, uh, latch doesn't close, right? UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Watergate. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Watergate, right. (laughs) So that's how we got in that office. As it turned out in that case, the files were in route between the two; they actually weren't there. So we took some other stuff, you know, about how they were electroshocking people or--oh, there was something about a report on Russian electric shock, blah-blah-blah. We got whatever they had, um, got back and said, uh, told 'em, you know, that, uh, as it turned out, you know, the files were in transit, they weren't at either location at this point in time. We didn't get in any trouble for it, you know, I guess they'd hire another mission later to do it. The way we got the files out of the, um, Health Department files on Scientology was, uh, we went in the building, um, after hours. Um, we had to work around the cleaning people every day in that particular situation. Um, we posed as employees of the Health Department in that situation and we'd sit at desks and pretend like we were working while they did their cleaning (laughter). UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: How did you get in? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Uh, at the time the security was pretty poor, we didn't have to use a lock pick or anything. We went in when the building was open, right? They would, uh--oh, I had a, uh, an agent in there; not that I recruited her and sent her in--she was already working there. She was a Scientologist who had a job there already, and I found out about that. So it wasn't a matter of "How do we get in?", it was "How do we get out?" (laughs) in that case. So we would get in while they were still open. They would lock the doors, we were locked inside. But when we were done with our nightly dirty work, right, I would call her on the phone--"Come down here and unlock the door for us." And that's how we got out, okay? (laughs) One night I went to, um--me and my partner were upstairs copying files. I went to go down out of the building for some reason. Um, and there was a trap, uh, you know, they had done something. I guess we had taken a break for a month or so or something, went back and get some more. And, uh, they had done something. They built a double-door system, right? To exit the building. Um, it's one of these glass cage things, you know, where I walk through the first door and that closed behind me and locked, right? And I couldn't get out the next door, which was also locked, so I'm locked inside this cubicle-- UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Right, right-- MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Okay-- UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Got you. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: And a camera is on me and the guy is talking to me and so, "What are you doing in the building?", right? (laughter) UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Take that-- MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Yeah-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Think on your feet. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: I had to totally think on my feet because I wasn't planning for this event, right? And so I said, "Well, um, my girlfriend works here and, uh, I was sitting in the lobby over there waiting for her to get off work. I thought she was working overtime. Uh, you know, I just came to the conclusion I guess she must have left and I didn't see her, and so now I'm just trying to get out of the damn building!" Right? And he bought it; he buzzed me out. He says, "Okay", he buzzed me out, right ? "MY PARTNER IS TRAPPED UP THERE." MIKE McCLAUGHRY: So I got out but my partner is trapped up there. But fortunately we had this girl that was a Scientologist that worked there. I called her up and I said, "My partner's stuck up there, come get him out of there!" (laughs) Which she did; she had the proper ID, she walked in. The guy that was the guard--"Here's my ID"--lets her in the building. She escorts the guy out. And that's how we got out that night. THE FBI RAID MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You could have told people who were in Scientology or people in the world that what the GO was doing--let's say the GO had a defector and one of those guys like me walked out and said, "Um, this is what we're doing"--nobody would have believed it. Okay? Same holds true for today. You try to go tell people who are other Scientologists or people in the normal society, "This is what RTC is doing today", and they don't--they won't believe it. Okay? So, um--but the GO raid happened, right? And the person who would have been saying that back at the time would have been totally vindicated that he was telling the truth by the fact that the FBI raid, walking out of there with box loads of evidence that this was the daily work of these people, okay? UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: The person who, uh, decided to, um, you know, be brave enough to come out and tell everybody what was going on in there all of a sudden becomes believable because of the box loads of evidence that the FBI walked out with. At that point it was undeniable. There was no way for those people to get out of it. They had all the evidence they needed for conviction. Um, the same situation exists today. Uh, they've got a few individuals that are coming out of RTC, OSA area, saying, "This is what's going on." I highly recommend you believe what they're telling you. Even if they don't have documented proof in their hand. Maybe we ought to have another raid and you'll have plenty of documented proof. (laughs) When that raid happened I was working in San Francisco. Uh, we got news that the FBI was raiding down there. Um, prior to that raid happening, we just wrote reports because we were autonomous, nobody could come into the Guardian's Office and look at what we were doing, and we just wrote it the way it was, you know? It was, like, "Hi, this is Mike. Today I did 16 Black Ops, uh, spied on this, lock picked that", you know, we just said it however it was. There was no effort to encode anything or anything; it's just, you know, reported it straight the way it happened. Uh, so what the FBI got was, um, you know, just the most damaging evidence you could imagine. We knew the cat was out of the bag and there was really no hope. This phone call I got was that they were raiding the files down there and I knew what that meant was that, you know. And there was a potential for a raid on every Guardian's Office around the world at the time, and so I was told to get the heck out of there. What we did was went out and got a--rented a U-Haul type truck, Ryder type truck, a huge one. We took all of our, um, intelligence files out, put 'em in the back of that truck and left, you know, drove across--drove a couple states away or something like that. We operate out of the back of that thing, um, for a while. After the raid, we got instructions to, uh, go through all of our files, one by one, every page, and just take a razor blade and hack out of there anything that was incriminating. Um-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Now what particularly were you told to hack out? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Down in L.A. I think they were told to, uh, get rid of any documents that showed that Ron was-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Right-- MIKE McCLAUGHRY: --running Scientology in any fashion. We didn't have that problem in San Francisco so that wasn't one of our orders. Ron didn't issue any orders to us directly. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You know what I mean? Um, we got all of our orders from USGO. Even if they came from him, they came to us via USGO-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Yeah. Yes. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: And they didn't say they were his orders. Um, so, you know, we just spent a while, you know, just cutting out, you know, all this criminal stuff, and in some cases it was the whole damn file--the whole damn file is criminal, so just throw that whole file out of here! (laughter) You know, they did their grand jury things, you know. They, they indicted the people they wanted to and--I didn't happen to be one of them; I could have been one of them, but I, you know--the majority of us, for whatever reason--I still don't know to this day--they let us off the hook. Anyway, I didn't complain about that, I was happy (laughter). And on the day the statute of limitations ran out, you know, I had a little party! (laughter) I was out of San Francisco, but Sacramento was part of my area. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Uh-huh. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: All of northern California, in fact probably larger than that, was my area. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You know, all the way to the next org, see what I'm saying? UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Yeah. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: So if anything happened in Sacramento, I packed my bag and I went down and handled it. I don't know the people there. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Right. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You know, I go in the org, you know, I look around at the people that are on-lines there, you know. I know what I'm there to do; I'm there to recruit a spy, you know. And I just look at people and evaluate them in my own opinion, you know. Does this person look like they are, uh, enough of a Scientologist that I could ask them to do something like that and they would do it. That's all. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Did you find that it was difficult to find Scientologists that would do that? MIKE McCLAUGHRY: No, sorry to say! (laughs) I mean, there was a lot of people I didn't talk to. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Right. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Because I knew ahead of time this guy ain't got what it takes, you know. So I guess I was good at picking them. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Uh-huh. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Because, um, I can't think of any case where I asked the person to do it and they said no. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. OVERT VS. COVERT MIKE McCLAUGHRY: We would try to go and find out things overtly when it came to giving information to PR and Legal. We would try to get the information overtly, you know, like legally, so that they could use it. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You know what I mean? A lot of cases we, we would obtain information covertly. Uh, let's say that--okay, here's a specific example; in fact, it involves Vaughn. Okay? The San Francisco Better Business Bureau was in the same building as the org. They were one floor below us! (laughs) And, uh-- UNIDENTIFIED MAN: They were a threat. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Well, yeah, you know, they--they had a nasty little file on Scientology. You know, if anybody called them about Scientology, you know, they'd go, "Yeah, yeah, yeah", you know, and give them some critical stuff, right? So they were an enemy. So we, you know--our task was to get their file so that PR could go in there and, uh, you know, try to dead-agent the thing, that kind of stuff, you know. Well, I got a Scientologist to be the janitor for the building. That gave us the key to the Better Business Bureau. Okay? Uh, he hands the key over to me. We went in there at night, me and a couple of other guys. We copied all their files, um, and then we walked out and, uh, we had 'em. That's how we got 'em. Then, uh, PR, which was Vaughn at the time--Vaughn Young, PR in San Francisco--we turned the files over to him so we had to have some story about how did we get this. Well, how we got that is we wrote a letter, we typ--you know, we didn't write it, we typed it. We went on their (laughs)--we went on the BBB's own typewriters, right, because you can track typewriters. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Like fingerprints sometimes. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Yeah. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Right, so we didn't type it on our typewriter, we typed it on their typewriter. Why not? We're in their damn building! (laughter) So we typed a little letter from a, uh, uh--you know,the letter said that, you know, they had some ax to grind with their boss, the BB--like it's coming from a person that works at the BBB, right? Is typing this letter, "and by the way, I don't think this is right, and here's their file." And mailed it. Well, that isn't how we got it, but that's what the letter said how we got it, and therefore that made that data overt. You see what I mean? It looked like it was overtly obtained; well, it wasn't. Well, that's common practice, I mean, that's just standard, everyday stuff, okay? We had to take information that we had obtained covertly and illegally and make it-- UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Sugar-coat it. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: --you know, make it overt. How can we use it overtly? How can we use it legally? How can we use it in PR? Yeah, yeah. That was, you know, just part of the day's work. Okay? So (laughs) that's how we nailed them, okay? So then Vaughn goes and gets the press, right? The media, I'm talking about. The newspaper guys, right? The TV guys, cameras, everything, stomps into the BBB, throws the file down--"What the hell is this?" You know what I mean? (laughs) And then tears--proceeds to tear 'em up in front of the press. NO ONE IS SAFE MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Nobody was safe from this. There was nobody excluded from this. I don't care if you're a judge, you're the President, you work for the CIA, it doesn't matter. You're just a private citizen, you're a cop--God, I don't care if you're a cop, I'll tear you apart! (laughs) You know what I mean? From this tech. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: No boundaries. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: No. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: No boundaries. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Uh-uh. HURTING PEOPLE MIKE McCLAUGHRY: My frame of mind at the time I was doing this was that, uh--which is no question in my mind the frame of mind of the people who do it today-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Uh-huh. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: --is that, uh, Scientology was the savior of the world, or if that's the right word. We were gonna clear the planet, uh, we were gonna eliminate, uh, criminality, insanity and war from this planet. Those were the aims of Scientology, right? And we felt like we had the technology to do that with and that anybody that would destroy that technology, um, was, you know, um-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Fair Game. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Well, we weren't gonna let 'em do it. AFTER THE RAID MIKE McCLAUGHRY: After the raid in '77, I started getting really physically ill, you know, ending up in hospitals and stuff, because I was hating what I was doing, and I wanted to get out of it in the worst way but I didn't know how. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Uh-huh. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You know. Um, in 1979, two years after the raid happened, they asked me to be the security officer at the USGO. And I hated L.A., I loved San Francisco, I never wanted to leave there. They'd always been asking me to go work at USGO and I always said no because I don't want to live in L.A. Well, I wanted to get out of doing Black Ops and, uh, breaking the law, you know, all the time like that, sufficiently bad that I took the job. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You know, because I didn't have to do the spying, I didn't have to do the Black Ops any more, I didn't have to break the law any more. All I had to do was work inside an organization, right? And look for spies. That's all I had to do. And I said, "Well, this is, you know, this is wonderful!" (laughs) And I gladly took the job, you know. Part 4 CATCHING A SPY MIKE McCLAUGHRY: You should know about this in case anybody, uh, you know, because I've told some people and in case it ever comes up in a court case or anything like that, you know, then you'd have it from me. I'd be really the only one who knows about this. Um--well, there's a couple of people, but basically while I was being security officer at USGO, um, there was a fellow, uh, who had been sent in by the Air Force. Um, he was a captain in the Air Force and he was working for, uh--what's Air Force Intelligence called? Uh, I forget the initials for it. He was on-lines at ASHO. Uh, he had made an application for the Guardian's Office and he was also making an application to, um, get on-lines at AOLA and do his Clearing Course and Upper Levels. I'm being the security officer at USGO. This guy shows up. His name was Bruce, I don't remember his last name, but he was captain in the Air Force. Um, he was appli--he applied to get in the GO so of course I would be somebody that would have to look at him. I took a look at him and I went, "Hmm", you know? (laughter) I didn't know he was captain in the Air Force at the time; just looking at this guy, I went, you know. I got a spy in on him. Um, he made friends with this guy named Bruce. They were pow-wowing around at night together and stuff like that. My spy was, of course--his cover was to pretend like he was somewhat disaffected, you know, and therefore could be trusted. Once that was accomplished, then I pretended like I was, um, the person--although I wasn't, right? He wanted to get on AOLA lines. I found out from my spy that this guy was stealing materials from ASHO at night and mailing them back to an Air Force base in Georgia. He wanted to get on AOLA lines. Uh, he was applying to get on AOLA lines, and therefore I told him--now, he didn't know who I was, right? He didn't know where I worked or anything. Um, I told him that I was the person that worked at AOLA who approved people to get on AOLA lines. So, uh, he thought I was the guy that he had to appeal to, to get approval. Um, so I said, "Well, before we give anybody approval, you know, we ask them questions on a meter first." And, um, I had a Sec Checker, uh, who was also a GO person, her name was Connie--maybe Rhodes or something like that-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Rhodes, yeah. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Yeah. Frank and Connie Rhodes ? UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Yeah. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Yeah. She--you know, I liked her. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: She was tough. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Yeah. She was also funny. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: Um, (laughs) but anyway, she did the meter stuff, right, on these guys. I would sit in the room beside her and I could also ask questions if I wanted to. Um, although this isn't Gang Bang Sec-Check type stuff, you know, I didn't keep people up past all hours, you know, I didn't beat 'em up or anything. Uh, basically our technique for catching people was investigation tech, not the meter. The meter was there to fool him, not that we were relying on it in any way; we didn't care what the meter did. Okay? (laughs) It was just the delusional tactic for him thinking that we--he believed in the meter; we did not. Okay? (laughs) UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: So that's why it was on the meter. Um-- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: So anyway, I would go down and ask him questions every night for about a week, you know, things that I wanted to know, you know. Did he work for any government agency, blah-blah-blah, stuff like this, right? (clears throat) Uh, we led him to--he, he lied through his teeth, right, to us on every question I asked him. Um, we led him to believe that we believed his answers, right? And, and Connie let him know that, you know, the meter was agreeing with what he was saying. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Um-hmm. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: So he felt safe every night that he left our questioning session. And he went back and he'd talk to my spy. And he would brag on all the lies he told and got away with! (laughter) "Those dumb son-of-a, you know, you know what I told 'em tonight? That ain't the truth." And that's how I got the whole story, see. (laughs) So at the end of the, you know, four or five days of doing this, we sit down to have a, a, um, a meeting with the guy, right? We're--he's not on the meter any more. Uh, we had led him to believe all the way along that he was passing this thing. And he came in just happy as a clam, like a celebration, right? Like we were just gonna write him and say, "You're on the OT Levels", right? That's what he thought was gonna happen. He sits down that night and, uh, I say, "Well, Bruce, we got a problem here." (laughs) And so I start to tell him, uh, what my spy's been telling me. And he kind of turns white, you know, and, uh, I said, "Now what about you being in the Air Force?" So then he starts to, in the hopes of getting us to, um, approve him, he starts talking to me, right? And he starts telling me--and he knows about what's going on at SRI. There's no way for him to know what's going on at SRI, you know. Um, unless he was in Intelligence, you know, because nobody in Scientology told him, that's my point; the government had to tell him about it. So, uh, he lays it all out, and I say, "Well, who's your Case Officer and where are they and what is your mission?" and stuff like that, and, uh, he's over there sweating, he's trying to get out of this. And, uh, and, you know, in the course of conversing he tells me, you know, he's trying to give me presents. He tells me about the SRI stuff. He goes, "You know, you guys are considered to be a national security risk because of those experiments up there at SRI." Uh, you know, "We"--you know, "We don't want people running around here who can exteriorize, who can spy on us", you know. Um, "Also those tests that you did with magnetic fields, right?" A guy could influence him with his thought. Uh, he said that we were interested in that because, um--actually, you know what happened is I told him I wasn't gonna let him on when he spilled all these beans, um, because the jig was up, you know. Um, and he goes, you know, "What we thought we could do"--and that's when he told me "We got a hundred guys back in Georgia waiting to do this stuff as soon as I send it to 'em.", right, what we thought we could do is if they fired their missiles at us, right, because the magnetic field is the guidance system on a missile, if we could have our own OTs turn 'em around and send 'em back down the hole they came out of. See? (laughs) UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Oh. MIKE McCLAUGHRY: That's what they were looking at. So that's where that whole story comes from; it's from that guy. YESTERDAY & TODAY MIKE McCLAUGHRY: As everybody now knows, you know, the GO was involved in this kind of thing. And I'd like to point out something that applies to today. Because the GO and all these things I'm talking about have not changed one bit. Just because they dismantled the GO and changed the name, uh, the hat and the personnel and what they're doing and are supposed to be doing hasn't changed a fraction, okay? It's the same thing. This is our daily work, you know. This isn't something that happened occasionally. This is what we went in to work to do every day and did every day. It was either getting spies in; breaking the law really didn't matter, you know, and doing Black Ops on people. © 2000 LMT Media |
|
David Miscavige in action
Who's really David Miscavige |
|
|
LA SCIENTOLOGIE DANS LES MÉDIAS
|
|
Un must: "Ron Hubbard, le gourou démasqué" Ce livre de Russell Miller révèle la face cachée de la scientologie. On y découvre un Ron Hubbard, malade, mythomane et poursuivi par la justice. Il est disponible en format pdf ou html sur notre site. Nous avons également publié une version résumée.
|
|
| [Accueil][Objectifs][Nouveautés][Pétitions][Témoignages][Faire un don][Articles médias][Jura et les sectes][La manipulation] |