[Accueil][Objectifs][Nouveautés][Pétitions][Témoignages][Faire un don][Articles médias][Jura et les sectes][La manipulation]

 

SCIENTOLOGY versus CNN

Black Propaganda - Anderson Cooper is not the only journalist to be targeted
by the Scientology and its Freedum Magazine

Scientologists Distribute Anti-Cooper Magazine Outside CNN (mediabistro.com - Jul 13, 2010)

The Scientology’s black propaganda against CNN is primarily intended to reassure and reinforce the Scientologists against the "enemies" (anti-scientologie - July 15, 2010)



 

Scientologists Distribute Anti-Cooper Magazine Outside CNN

 
Anderson Cooper has really done it now.
Source: http://www.mediabistro.com/... - Jul 13, 2010

The Church of Scientology has gotten aggressive with its campaign in the wake of Cooper's week-long "Scientology: A History of Violence," which aired at the end of March.

While that was some time ago, a few months is apparently the amount of time it takes to create the very unusual 95-page glossy publication Freedom magazine handed out on the street Monday morning in front of the CNN offices in Manhattan. The majority of its content has been posted online here for a little while now.

Freedom, "published by the Church of Scientology since 1968," devotes the entire issue -- and accompanying 30 minute DVD -- to a attempted takedown of the CNN anchor, the "AC360" crew, and the interview subjects featured in the series. (Please do yourself a favor and check out Cooper's "statement" at 11:30 in this incredible video.)

As noted in their video, the Church of Scientology now owns its own printing facilities to manufacture publications like these. And Cooper is not the only journalist to be targeted by the group. In 2009, Freedom went "inside the St. Petersburg Times" and in 2007 "exposed" the BBC program "Panorama."
 

 

Source: http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/25/scientology-a-history-of-violence/


Comment

The Scientology’s black propaganda against CNN is primarily intended to reassure and reinforce the Scientologists against the "enemies".

 

The sect does not perceive that by doing so it gives an image of its public relations’ frenzied direction!

 

Scientology would do better to invest its money in a major reform of its criminal methods...

 

Here is another example of a dirty campaign by the sect against a Swiss citizen.

http://www.anti-scientologie.ch/annexes-diffamation.htm#espion


In this article the scientology invents a story about Jean-Luc Barbier, and sends it quickly to the press. Jean-Luc Barbier is accused of hitting the chairwoman of the Committee of Scientology - Human Rights. The complaint, a usual tactic, is rejected and the case is closed.

http://www.anti-scientologie.ch/instrumentalisation-justice-2.htm

 

Some credentials speak for themselves:

http://www.anti-scientologie.ch/annexes3/attestation-melichar-7-avril-1991.jpg
http://www.anti-scientologie.ch/annexes3/attestation-Bodmer-17-mars-1994.jpg

Jean-Luc Barbier

a Scientology survivor

July 15, 2010

 


Scientology's Abuse of the Legal System

3/1995 – Former Scientologist Stacy Brooks talks about Hubbard's use of the legal system to destroy critics of the group. Hubbard wrote that the courts should be used to "ruin them utterly."
 

Video: Testimony of Stacy Brooks

source: www.iowngod.com

La violence est le fondement de la scientologie (Anonymous-montreal - 29 mars 2010)

La scientologie considère que c'est un "High Crimes" que d'appeler la police (Anonymous Montreal - 31 mars 2010)

Audio: Tommy Davis pris en flagrant délit de mensonge au sujet de la règle qui impose la rupture des liens familiaux (2009)


Church of Scientology says abuse claims handled internally (ac360.blogs.cnn.com - March 31, 2010)

Scientology: A history of violence (ac360.blogs.cnn.com - March 25, 2010)

Video 1: Testimony of Marty Rathbun, a member of the Church of Scientology for 27 years (CNN - March 29, 2010)

Video 2: Testimony of Jeff Hawkins, Tom DeVocht, Amy Scobee, Steve Hall (CNN - March 30, 2010)

Video 3: Nobody called the police (CNN - March 31, 2010)

Video 4: Testimony of Christy Collbran. What happens to members of the Scientology when they decide to leave thie church of Scientology ? (CNN - April 1, 2010)

Video 5: Never defend, always attack (CNN - April 2, 2010)


Video : The Secret Life of Women in Scientology (December 2008)

Audio : Tommy Davis is lying. Scientology denied deconnexion (Radio Paul -2009)

 

Scientology is not a church or charity. It is, in fact, a cult

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/commentandanalysis/1422841.0/ - 24th May 2007
[Texte intégral]

Someone had started a rumour that I had been killed in a fire

BBC reporter John Sweeney was last week seen losing his temper at the end of a sixmonth investigation into scientology. In 1994, The Argus published a damning exposé of the East Grinsteadbased "religion".

Former chief reporter Paul Bracchi, who secretly infiltrated the cult, remembers how its followers relentlessly threatened and pursued him in revenge for criticising their deceptive and manipulative methods. Here Mr Bracchi, who now lives in London, tells the chilling story of how he was stalked and intimidated for months afterwards, even receiving a bullet in the post at The Argus headquarters in Hollingbury.

The voice at the end of the line was trembling. "Is that Mr Bracchi ?"

"Yes, it is," I replied. The caller could not have been more relieved. I was supposed to be dead. Someone had started a rumour that I had been killed in a fire.

The same people who had tried to obtain my ex-directory phone number, handed out pamphlets attacking me and dispatched an American private detective - an ex-Los Angeles police officer - to Britain to frighten and smear the source who had helped me expose their activities.

Almost daily threatening letters arrived by fax and post at The Argus where I used to work.

Messages were left on the answer machine at the home of the managing director. Strangers turned up in his village asking questions about him.

And the culprits behind this campaign of intimidation? Step forward the church of scientology.

The Guardian and The Mail have exposed disturbing apparent links between the "church" and the City of London Police.

Last week in a Panorama programme, reporter John Sweeney was seen losing his temper with a scientologist, claiming afterwards that he had been driven over the edge by a concerted campaign of harassment by the group.

I, more than anyone, could understand why.

Sweeney spent six months investigating this so-called religion. I had spent more than a year doing so when stories of my "unfortunate demise" began circulating. By the time you read this article, the church of scientology will no doubt be unleashing its attack dogs - sorry, officials from the Office of Special Affairs - on me again.

The founder of the "religion" - science fiction writer L Ron Hubbard - himself issued directives on how "to handle the Press", including tips on how to get a reporter "fired and discredited". Well, they have tried and failed with me once already.

The backlash was swift

My first report - The Secrets Of Saint Hill - was published more than ten years ago. Saint Hill is the castle in East Grinstead where the UK headquarters of scientology is based.

The backlash was swift. The first principle of scientology, you see, is "shoot the messenger".

Critics who had contributed to the articles were also targeted. Some of them found Eugene Ingram - who had been branded an "insidious individual" in a court case in the US - on their doorstep.

He "visited" the 77-year-old mother of one of my sources as well as his parents' former home in Staffordshire and his wife's family.

Ingram knew that the man's relatives would not "dish the dirt" on my source. That was not the point.

He just wanted to let me - and everyone else who had helped me - know he was in town. In the parlance of scientology, this is called a "noisy investigation". It has only one purpose - to intimidate.

The real victims of scientology, of course, are not journalists but the parents who have lost sons or daughters to these deluded fanatics.

Their harrowing stories - of which more below - help explain why, in Britain, scientology is recognised neither as a church nor a charity.

It is, in fact, a cult. Scientologists do not like that word so let me repeat it - CULT.

Hubbard, the man who created scientology in 1952, has an unusual CV for a religious and spiritual leader. As well as being a writer, he was a congenital liar. Quite simply a charlatan. That was the view of a High Court judge in 1984, who said Hubbard's theories were "corrupt, sinister and dangerous".

If nothing else, the movement's survival is proof that with money - scientology is worth billions worldwide - you can make some people, even intelligent people, believe almost anything.

Stars such as Tom Cruise and John Travolta have given scientology a profile and showbusiness gloss it simply does not deserve.

Indeed, those who are not familiar with its tactics and history regard scientologists - who are convinced we are all descended from a race of aliens called thetans - as weird, not wicked.

This ignorance has been ruthlessly exploited in Britain. In October, a £24 million scientology centre opened in the heart of London's Square Mile and is now one of 30 "missions" in the country.

Narconon, a scientology group which claims it can get people off drugs, has been invited into schools and colleges. How many teachers and parents know of Narconon's links to the cult?

"Community volunteers" from Saint Hill - could there be a more ironic name for the HQ of a cult? - have been enthusiastically lobbying politicians, police officers and businesses in the City.

The recruitment drive was part of Hubbard's "master plan".

It is spelled out in scientology documents - namely to infiltrate and convert key institutions in society.

The process, so the thinking goes, will eventually lead to a scientology government.

And the "church" has succeeded in cultivating contacts. Up to 20 officers in the City of London Police - from constables to superintendents - have accepted hospitality worth thousands from scientologists.

This included free invitations to a £500-a-head charity dinner where the guest of honour was Tom Cruise.

He is now reported to have bought a home near Saint Hill.

One senior police officer appeared in a church of scientology video and another, Chief Superintendent Kevin Hurley, spoke at the opening of the new "mission" near St Paul's Cathedral, saying the cult was "raising the spiritual wealth of society".

Here's a question for Chief Superintendent Hurley. What kind of church, back in the Seventies, implemented a series of covert operations in America which culminated in the bugging of the US Justice Department?

His ringing endorsement was a triumph for the spin doctors of Saint Hill.

The "church's" cramped, old London base in Tottenham Court Road could not be more different from its magnificent new home in EC4. Could there be a better place to woo influential new friends?

Among them is Sebastien Sainsbury, one of the heirs to the Sainsbury dynasty and European executive director at Lakeshore Capital, which has almost one billion dollars under management.

Scientologists with brochures and leaflets have also descended on investment bank Bridgewell Group, law firms Eversheds, Dechert LLP, Shadbolt and Co and PR consultants Merlin.

The organisation is believed to have a huge expense account to wine and dine contacts but then it can afford to be generous.

Scientology is worth millions in Britain alone and much of its wealth is derived from members paying for courses.

The scientologists, it now emerges, secured relief of £281,344 on the full rates of £351,680 on their London base - a discount of 80 per cent.

The City of London Corporation said the group had been entitled to the huge reduction because it carried out "charitable works". A member of the corporation, Alderman Ian Luder, a partner with leading City accounting and consultancy firm Grant Thornton, spoke at the building's grand opening of the "effective" help scientology provided for drug users.

In 2003 the Advertising Standards Authority upheld a complaint by the Church of England over unsubstantiated claims that the scientologists' Narconon programme, a combination of vigorous exercise, vitamin therapy, counselling, and sauna sessions to sweat out toxins, had saved "250,000 people from drug abuse".

Scientology's promotional drive is said to be spearheaded by the group's Office of Special Affairs.

Officially, this department is responsible for public relations and legal matters. But OSA operatives are also, it is claimed, scientology's secret service.

Those who undermine the mores and beliefs of scientology - including journalists - must be ruthlessly dealt with.

Hubbard said they were "fair game" and could be
"tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed".

That policy, the cult claims, no longer exists. The following account reveals a different story.

A woman, who we shall call Sarah, claims she and her husband, who briefly joined the "church" a few years ago, received death threats after he was wrongly suspected of stealing scientology documents from Saint Hill.

She said: "One day two well-built men in dark suits from Saint Hill arrived at my door. I told them my husband wasn't in but they forced their way in and started rifling through the bookshelves. When my husband returned they bundled him into the car.

"Finally he came back shaking from head to toe. He told me they'd threatened to kill him if he didn't tell him the whereabouts of some stolen documents."

Later, a typed note arrived in the post branding him a "suppressive person" (an enemy of scientology) and informing him he was now fair game. Other notes followed.

Sarah said: "For months after, we had anonymous notes delivered in the post almost daily. They said, You bastard,' You're dead,' Nothing will save you.' It was terribly frightening.

After three months we moved and didn't tell anyone where we were going."

Where does the organisation get the money to hire these goons ?

Well, organised religions can be very lucrative - as L Ron Hubbard himself recognised.

Giant photographs of Hubbard adorn the new London headquarters, and his many pronouncements - such as "Man is basically good and it is this basic goodness we want to set free" - are stencilled on walls.

A comment you won't find displayed, though, is the one Hubbard made to an authors' convention before he invented scientology.

"Writing for a penny a word," he said, "is ridiculous. If a man really wants to make a million dollars he should start his own religion."

Basic introductory sessions for scientology cost up to £80. Then there is another course which costs £300, then another.

Indeed, passing all the stages to scientology "enlightenment" - the so-called Bridge To Total Freedom - can cost hundreds of thousands of pounds and has left some people with inheritances frittered away, remortgaged homes and debt.

One elderly couple "lost" their daughter Emily when she married a scientologist in 2002.

Her father said: "My wife noticed it straight away but I tried to dismiss it.

But it became obvious she wasn't the loving, caring daughter we had nurtured.

"We sat her down and tried to discuss my findings and what I saw shocked me to the core. After a few minutes of talking rationally and reasonably to her, Emily erupted, How dare you question my religion?

What you have read is all lies. If you raise this issue one more time I will never contact you.' I think to say she had been brainwashed would be too simplistic.

"This was mind manipulation at the highest level. If she chooses to come back to us we would welcome her with open arms but I can't just live with it. I can't bear the thought of that happening to my beautiful daughter."

What was the phrase Chief Superintendent Hurley used to describe his new neighbours in the City? Ah yes, they were "raising the spiritual wealth of society".

For those, like me, who have faced the wrath of this cult, they are words which ring as hollow as the baloney on which the church of scientology itself is founded.

 

 

FREEDUM MAGAZINE

published by the Church of Scientology

Anderson Furrows His Brow

Source: http://www.freedommag.org/special-reports/cnn/anderson-furrows-his-brow.html

Anderson Cooper: “Guys, I appreciate you talking again. Thank you very much.”

Anti-Scientology apostates (more or less in unison): “Thank you, Anderson. Thank you.”

Thus Anderson Cooper closed out his series on the Church of Scientology, and thus his apostates bid him farewell. In contrast to the anchorman’s steely-eyed interrogation of Church officials, Cooper’s last exchange with this self-proclaimed posse of tough guys is strangely intimate, almost touching. He wears blue jeans. He listens to their woes with sympathetically furrowed brow. He carefully prefaces every question with a first name:

“Marty, why didn’t you...?” or “Jeff, why would...”

And they respond in kind: “You know, Anderson, you asked about...”

There is even a gentle nod to an apostate heard in absentia and he is simply “Mike.”

As you wish, Anderson...only this time it’s the full story and the whole truth.

So, yes, Anderson has come to believe in his “guys” and they, in turn, believe in Anderson.

But what’s absolutely unbelievable is that Cooper thinks he can get away with this hogwash and pull off what even the greatest hucksters in history failed to accomplish, i.e., fool all the people all the time.

So in the immortal words of Cooper himself, let’s start “keeping ‘em honest” by presenting his Posse of Apostates as they truly are:

Marty Rathbun, a former external affairs officer, removed from authority within the Church seven years ago for gross malfeasance and violent behavior. To be sure, he is a self-proclaimed psychotic with a long history of violence. He committed 50 separate acts of assault against co-workers. He is also potentially homicidal and, in fact, nearly killed a man with his fists. That he models himself after an ax-wielding lunatic from a Stephen King horror story is likewise a matter of record, and he is not joking when announcing his appearance with a trademark “Heeeeere’s Marty!”

Mike Rinder, another erstwhile external affairs officer removed from post for gross malfeasance and unstable behavior. But the real clue to his character lies in the fact he was Rathbun’s

pet punching bag. Indeed, the two men worked together on numerous occasions and their relationship was frequently tinged with what can only be described as sadomasochistic impulses. That Rinder now refers to Rathbun as his “best good buddy” is yet another strange twist in this story.

Tom DeVocht, a former Church construction manager and still another with a proclivity for violence. (He especially enjoyed wrestling Rinder to the ground.) By his own admission, he is also an unrepentant liar and, in fact, is proud of it. Indeed, there is nothing wrong with lying for financial gain, he boasts, so long as “you don’t get caught.”

Amy Scobee. She is another dismissed from any position of authority within the Church years earlier—specifically for sexual misconduct. When she failed to curb her libidinous behavior, she was ultimately expelled.

Jeff Hawkins, a former Church copywriter who claims to have left Scientology to avoid an overseas transfer—possibly to Australia, possibly South Africa. In fact, however, the transfer was a figment of his own imagination, and he actually left when his own sordid misconduct came to light.  He is also a member of a cyberterrorist organization known as Anonymous that remains under federal investigation for hate crimes against the Church of Scientology—with two of its members already prosecuted, convicted and sentenced to prison for said hate crimes.

Steve Hall, a former Church scriptwriter with a dismal production record. He currently serves as “webmaster” for the Posse and ekes out a living scooping doggie droppings from suburban lawns. He is further known within the Posse for apparently creating the universe (not necessarily in seven days) and claims he was previously both Jesus and the Buddha (not necessarily in that order).

Although not formally on the CNN payroll, all above-mentioned names purportedly enjoyed free airfare, free lodging, free meals and limousine service to and from Manhattan. After all, the moment AC360 sat them in front of a camera, these people were no longer merely violent, delusional and deviant; they were suddenly CNN sources.

They were by no means, however, media stars and even their allotted fifteen minutes of fame proved ephemeral.

Viz: Between Cooper’s introduction of the Posse on a Monday and his sweet adieu on Friday, a full third of the AC360 audience had already tuned out, and no wonder what with critical reviews like this one:

“Honestly, this is getting tiresome...”

Followed by:

“Somebody please wake me up when this is over...”

After which it was:

“Anderson, you jackass!”

There was a lot more about the Posse itself—how Rathbun looked like he was in “extreme turmoil,” how the rest of them “sounded like a broken record” and how it felt “like an episode of Judge Judy except without the judging bit”

But let us now replay the record and scrutinize the evidence in light of what Cooper himself kept exhorting through those five dreary nights, i.e., that we must make up our own minds and judge for ourselves.

To which we now reply: As you wish, Anderson...only this time it’s the full story and the whole truth.

The Least Trusted Name in News

AC360: See Anderson Cooper Run for Ratings

If you would like to know why the network that calls itself “the most trusted name in news” is the least trustworthy, Freedom Magazine brings you, in living color, what Anderson Cooper refused to show.

With the ratings for Anderson Cooper 360 in a free fall over the past year and rumors rampant he is bailing out for another network, CNN had one final act of desperation up its sleeve.

CNN became the latest media outlet to buy into the increasingly over-the-top, bizarre tales spread by four admitted liars leading a self-proclaimed “Posse” of expelled former Church ofScientology staffers. Their yearlong orchestrated campaign exploits the media to run stories which attack their former Church, attack their former friends and even attack their own families — parents, wives and children. It’s all part of an effort to aggrandize themselves and make money by promoting everything from their self-published rants to their perverted style of psychological counseling and “deprogramming.”

In doing so, the once-great network — that nearly 20 years ago set the standard for journalism during the Persian Gulf War — broadcast five nights of so-called reports on the Church of Scientology, becoming the mouthpiece for a criminal group of cyberterrorists. It used salacious, false allegations to try to salvage a program whose ratings have been so anemic that at times only about a half-million viewers tune in — roughly the population of a mid-size city.

Far from conducting an actual investigation, CNN was simply the latest stop on the “Posse’s” anti-Scientology media tour. There was literally no original reporting — just a regurgitation of long disproven allegations that sourced from the Internet, and which dozens of outraged Church officials refuted with statements sworn under oath. This should have raised the antenna of any seasoned journalist, especially one who portrays himself as a skeptic, as Anderson Cooper does.

Yet in Cooper’s desperation to hold together his already band-aid-laden “investigation”—given one allegation after the next was shredded by documented evidence the Church provided — he chose to stop even informing the Church of the allegations. Specifically, after demanding and conducting an interview with a Church spokesman in July 2009, Cooper thereafter refused to ever again speak to any Church official. He also refused to provide any further specifics on allegations made about the Church and likewise refused to interview Church officials on two occasions — in New York and Los Angeles — including the so-called “victims” of the allegations.

Only after Church officials traveled to CNN headquarters in Atlanta and convinced CNN Corporate to force Cooper to interview them, did any such interview occur. Yet still, Cooper refused to provide specifics of allegations being made, all to ensure there would be no response to the lies Cooper admitted could not be substantiated with any proof.

And so we get:

A blatantly disprovable allegation more suited to a supermarket tabloid, yet so sensational that Cooper aired it no less than 14 times over five nights of shows — all while he smugly told his audience there was “no proof” of the allegation. Although at the same time, and out of the other side of his mouth, he urged viewers to “decide for themselves.” Had Cooper ever told the Church the substance of the allegation, he could have saved himself the embarrassment he now so rightfully deserves. Because there is proof the allegations are lies — miles of video footage—the exact sort of “proof” Cooper would have wanted, even demanded, if he were not merely pretending to be a journalist. (Watch the video: A “Beating Every Day” While 10,000 Miles Away.)

Then again, Cooper refused repeated invitations for open access to all Church facilities. His refusal to see for himself the specific Church facility at the center of the allegations again proves fatal in the post-broadcast review. As in, “pictures don’t lie.” (Watch the video: A Worker’s Paradise “Slave Camp.”)

At the heart of it all is Cooper’s utter lack of investigatory acumen. But even that is being charitable. Because while media have long been reporting on Cooper’s incompetence — a debate best left to his journalistic peers — what is incontrovertible is that he is positively dishonest. How else can one explain that after a single rushed interview in July 2009, nine months prior to broadcast, Cooper refused any further information from the Church ?

Then again, how else does one explain that the show was so obviously problematic to CNN its airing was put on hold in November 2009? Or the fact that it was suddenly pulled out of mothballs in March 2010 without a single communication to the Church in all that time?

  
Investigation ? Cooper never once stepped foot in a Church and
the sensational allegations he presented were taken from
interviews recorded almost a year before broadcast.

But most damning to any remaining credibility Cooper may have had, is when he told his audience he was presenting the results of a “nine-month investigation.” Investigation? He never once stepped foot in a Church and the sensational allegations he presented were taken from interviews recorded almost a year before broadcast. So Freedom presents what actually happened in Scientology during the nine-month period Cooper claims to have spent “investigating.” (Watch the video: Anderson Cooper’s Definition of “An Investigation.”)

All of this begs the question, Why did CNN try to ambush the Church in a headlong rush to air anything from a highly discreditable group of sources ?

It’s a well-known fact that CNN’s Anderson Cooper and his AC360 are in trouble. “Cooper’s Ratings Crash,” as Media Bistro put it, while the Los Angeles Times said Cooper “continued to struggle big time.” The New York Times noted that Cooper’s viewership is so weak he sometimes loses to reruns on the lesser-viewed HLN and MSNBC networks. But possibly Business

Insider answered it best: “In a Race for Ratings, CNN’s Anderson Cooper Goes After Scientologists.”

In fact, the only thing that seems to have mattered was ratings, no doubt an even more urgent priority after viewership for AC360 hit an embarrassing new low. So, in desperation, CNN dusted off the unsupported and stale “investigation” that had sat on a shelf since last year, aired the bitter rants of a handful of disgruntled former staffers — and promoted it as if it was a groundbreaking Edward R. Murrow report. (See A Timeline of CNN’s “Investigation.”)

After hearing nothing from AC360 since November 2009 (and conducting only one interview with the Church’s spokesperson, in July 2009), in the last week of March 2010, the Church was hit with an out-of-the-blue CNN press release announcing the series would air at the beginning of the week. A few hours later, the Church’s spokesperson received an obligatory “

FYI, the show is airing” e-mail from a low-level CNN producer.

The gist of the message: AC360 is immediately moving from 0 mph to 100 mph on the story without so much as making a phone call to find out if, in the past nine months, any update is needed. CNN’s suddenly aggressive attitude can no doubt only be explained if Cooper’s program is in fact on shaky ground, either because it is starved for viewers or because the rumors are true Cooper may jump to CBS—that is, if they’ll even have him anymore. For while CNN may have caved in to Cooper’s hissy fit over their refusal to air his investigation, when it finally did air, the public tuned out in droves and Cooper’s ratings continue their descent to the center of the earth.

 

La violence est le fondement de la scientologie (Anonymous-montreal - 29 mars 2010)

La scientologie considère que c'est un "High Crimes" que d'appeler la police (Anonymous Montreal - 31 mars 2010)

Audio: Tommy Davis pris en flagrant délit de mensonge au sujet de la règle qui impose la rupture des liens familiaux (2009)


Church of Scientology says abuse claims handled internally (ac360.blogs.cnn.com - March 31, 2010)

Scientology: A history of violence (ac360.blogs.cnn.com - March 25, 2010)

Video 1: Testimony of Marty Rathbun, a member of the Church of Scientology for 27 years (CNN - March 29, 2010)

Video 2: Testimony of Jeff Hawkins, Tom DeVocht, Amy Scobee, Steve Hall (CNN - March 30, 2010)

Video 3: Nobody called the police (CNN - March 31, 2010)

Video 4: Testimony of Christy Collbran. What happens to members of the Scientology when they decide to leave thie church of Scientology ? (CNN - April 1, 2010)

Video 5: Never defend, always attack (CNN - April 2, 2010)


Video : The Secret Life of Women in Scientology (December 2008)

Audio : Tommy Davis is lying. Scientology denied deconnexion (Radio Paul -2009)

 

     «Ron Hubbard, le gourou démasqué»

 

Ce livre de Russell Miller révèle la face cachée de l'église de scientologie. On y découvre un Ron Hubbard, malade, mythomane et poursuivi par la justice. Il est disponible en format pdf ou html sur notre site. Nous avons également publié une version résumée.

 

Exposing Scientology through streaming video

 

 

Français

                        

English

                        

Deutsch

 

Ces reportages vidéo dénoncent les dangers de la thérapie de scientologie. La scientologie est une nébuleuse sur laquelle ont enquêté de nombreux journalistes. Il suffit de répondre une fois à un questionnaire pour recevoir des prospectus et des invitations. Au départ elle peut même paraître séduisante mais très rapidement les premières dérives apparaissent.

 

Témoignage de Jean-Luc Barbier

English index

Presse-Artikel

 

 

 

contact@anti-scientologie.ch

Anti scientologie
est hébergé par
 

 

[Accueil][Objectifs][Nouveautés][Pétitions][Témoignages][Faire un don][Articles médias][Jura et les sectes][La manipulatio